The
final battle for Fort Brooke lasted over 20 years, but it was not fought
with cannon, guns or swords.
|
||
THE BATTLE IN A NUTSHELL
INTRODUCTION: WHAT TO DO WITH THE FORT BROOKE LAND? The following is from: Godna, Martin M. (1975) "Some Petitions Relating Tampa Families and the Disposal of Fort Brooke Lands, 1882-1883," Sunland Tribune: Vol. 2 , Article 5 at USF Library's Scholar Commons With
the end of Indian hostilities in South Florida long since concluded and
the withdrawal of all federal troops from the South in 1877, the U.S.
War Department began the deactivation of many southern military posts.
Among them was Fort Brooke at Tampa which had been established in 1824
and is considered to be the founding of Tampa as a town. |
||
Many Tampans desired that this land should not be developed for commerce or industry, but instead set aside as a public park for its great natural beauty. It would be a great opportunity for the town to have such a scenic landscape adjacent to downtown. |
|
|||
The petitioners urged that the Senate vest the land in the town of Tampa for use as a "park or public pleasure ground for the recreation of the inhabitants." LOUIS BELL, AN EARLY TAMPA PIONEER FROM CANADA In 1883, the second petition asked that Louis Bell be allowed to retain his home in the event that the land was sold. Bell, about eighty years old and a veteran of the Mexican and Seminole Wars, earned a "scanty subsistence" from his garden and had lived on the reservation land for years. Bell came to Fort Brooke sometime between the 1830 and 1840 censuses.
1840 Census, Fort Brooke/Tampa
1850 Census, Fort Brooke
1880 Census, Tampa
|
The structure built by Robert J. Hackley as his home in 1823, on land acquired by his father Richard in a Spanish land grant, was "dispossessed" from Hackley by Col. Brooke in 1824 while Hackley was away at Pensacola and Brooke arrived to build a fort.
But was the structure in
the photo really the house built by Robert Hackley?
The Hackleys were just one of several parties vying in the final battle for the Fort Brooke land when the U.S Government decommissioned Ft. Brooke. |
THE PETITIONS The fact that about 230 citizens in a town of 1,450 signed one or both of the petitions shows what a high degree of interest Tampans had concerning the ownership and use of this land. The signatures are a veritable "Who's Who" of early Tampa/Ft. Brooke.
Also in the Library's files are
transcripts of several letters and telegrams, most of which are dated in
the crucial early weeks of the controversy. They present a personal
record of the events and are especially insightful as to the actions of
such figures as community leader John T. Lesley and Florida's United
States Senator Wilkinson Call. |
TO THE HONORABLE SENATE
OF THE UNITED STATES IN CONGRESS ASSEMBLED THE PETITION OF THE
CITIZENS OF THE TOWN OF TAMPA IN THE COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH IN THE
STATE OF FLORIDA.
The petitioners show that they are citizens of the said town of Tampa. That at the present time existing on the Southern boundary of the said town are about 160 acres of land which is known as the Fort Brooke Reservation being a plot of ground now used as a Sanitary Station for the troops at Key West. It is understood that this land is about to be abandoned by the Military Authorities of the United States as a Military Station and your petitioners are informed and believe that efforts are being made by persons who are desirous of acquiring the same to have said lands transferred from the Department of War to the Department of the Interior so as to vest the same in the public domain and then purchase the said reservation for speculative purposes or otherwise. Or that Railway Companies which are building roads out of the immense grants of lands made to them for that purpose by the State of Florida are desirous of absorbing said reservation for their purposes and your petitioners show that the said grounds occupy a position of great beauty and now and always would afford a place of recreation for the inhabitants of said town as a park and as there are ample lands without defacing or cutting these lands into lots in the neighborhood for building purposes. Your petitioners therefore pray that the said lands be either retained by the Military Authorities intact or should they be handed over to the public domain that your honorable body will pass an act vesting the said lands in the said town of Tampa on condition that said land is retained unsubdivided as a park of public pleasure ground for the inhabitants of said town forever giving to the said town however the right to allow certain slightly public buildings to be erected thereon in such a manner as to not detract from the beauty and usefulness of said grounds. And your petitioners as in duty bound will ever pray. November 13th 1882 H. L. Crane, W. J. Campbell, J. K. Spencer, Jno T. Lesley, Henry Brummett, Wm. C. Brown, R. B. Thomas, Thos. A. Carruth, H. J. Madsen, Joseph Hawley, C. A. Harrison, Thos. E. Jackson, John Jackson, R. A. Jackson, Henry Allen, H. B. Whitehurst, Geo. Alexander, C. L. Friebele, Chas. F. Garrett, J. B. Furman, Otto Kammerer, J. H. Leonardy, W. J. Allen; A. P. Brockway, W. J. Knight, D. Ghira, Frank Ghira, W. G. Ferris, E. W. Ferris, H. L. Branch, M. A. Branch, G. E. (Haynsworth), John Darling, E. A. Clarke, Duff Post, W. A. Givens, D. B. Givens, L. F. McLeod, O. G. Wood (W. Goat), (F. A. Tim), (Gas. Fergur), W. T. Gordon, S. T. Hayden, J. J. Hayden, W. T. Hines, A. H. Hayden, G. W. Hayden, T. T. Smith, D. S. Buchanan, U. Sinclair Bird, C. Perkins, H. R. Benjamin, A. J. Bulloch, J. H. Krause, John P. Wall, Jas. Williams, Mary Williams, (R. Mugge), Bertta Hahn, John L. Elliott, (J. M. Eddins), Jos. A. Walker, A. Stillings, John Miller, A. W. Cuscaden, S. B. Casby, Wm. T. Haskins, P. H. Collins, D. K. Fisher, W. E. Haile, B. Leonardy, (Herrmann Weissbred), F. P. Kennedy, Jas. McKay, John Long, F. W. Bosworth, (M. Loant), T. A. LeBel, (? Howard), Henry Brumwick, Jas. Jackson, E. Durham, D. Jameson, B. A. Coward, John Culbreath, W. P. Culbreath, Jas. H. Culbreath, H. C. Culbreath, P. P. Culbreath, Asa Morgan, (W. Pope, Cu ? ), J. A. Campbell, H. Seling, D. Isaac Craft, H. M. Craft, T. W. Jones, T. F. Hampton, Geo. L. Calloway, Jacob Vogt, J. C. Guild, Matthew Hooper, Henry E. Wells, J. L. Haskins, R. B. Canning, H. M. Chapman, A. Niel, Sam Clay, Parkins Bods, J. T. Magbee, D. B. McKay, H. Proseus, J. A. Proseus, E. Tibery, S. W. Warns, J. H. Dorsey, James He. Wells, Mrs. E. C. Dorsey, L. S. Wells, W. T. Bolben, F. S. Lewis, Henry Brandon, Eola Morris, W. H. Ferris, James H. Holmes, Sallie M. Randolph, Anne McKrause, Josie W. Weissbred, Willie M. Robles, Charles F. Binkley, Joe H. Culbreath, Henry J. Krause, L. Blanche Henderson, Cornelia C. Pickett, W. H. Bulloch, James S. Hooper, Daisy Wall, Annie E. Hale, Alta E. Holmes, (Cora ? ), Cora L. Bulloch, Mamie T. Collins, Maggie F. Campbell, Lizzie Chekine, Julia T. McKay, Harry C. Parcell, Ronnie Hayden, Samuel Wells, Fannie Wells, Eva C. Haddon, Clarence Hill, ( ? ), ( ? ), Lizzie Bulloch, Stella Morrison, Mrs. M. Cuscaden, ( ? ), F. C. Binkley, C. Binkley, Mrs. E. C. Dorsey, G. B. Sparkman Mayor of Tampa, C. W. Wells, R. W. |
TO THE HONORABLE SENATE AND HOUSE
OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES CONVENED: The undersigned citizens of the Town of Tampa, County of Hillsborough and State of Florida respectfully represent that Louis Bell a citizen of the United States and residing in the Fort Brooke Reservation adjoining said Town of Tampa that said. Louis Bell has resided in said Reservation for many years, that he has been in the service of the United States for serving in the Mexican and Seminole Wars, that he is now old and infirm and unable to work for a living, that he has a dwelling, out houses, fruit trees and a garden in the premises from which he derives a scanty subsistence, that said Louis Bell is an honorable and worthy citizen and has always been true and faithful to the government of the United States. Your petitioners therefor pray that your honorable bodies grant to the said Louis Bell such relief in the premises as you think meet and just, allowing him possession of the land he now occupies as a home in the event that the Fort Brooke Reservation- is sold: the age and record of the valuable services of this old man will be found in the War Department and many of the old Army officers who served in the war aforesaid knew him personally. And your petitioners shall ever pray. K. Krause, Ja. H. Hickman, M. Weissbred, John L. Binkley, A. J. Bulloch, J. T. Magbee, E. Tinny, J. A. Proseus, A. Grillion, C. A. Masters, J. H. Krause, Joseph Grillion, I. G. Haynsworth, J. R. Swingly, E. A. Clarke, (? S. Gedelius), W. H. Givens, R. R. Thomas, W. G. Ferris, Josiah Ferris, C. L. Friebele, Chas. F. Garrett, J. A. Campbell, W. H. McFeely, I. J. Raine, Joseph Hawley, Matthew Hooper, Eliza Hooper, H. P. Kennedy, J. M. Dorsey, E. C. Dorsey, E. Delaunay, John Cole, F. C. Binkley, Kate Binkley, C. Perkins, J. C. Field, Thos. W. Perkins, Wm. Mahn, R. Mugge, D. Ghira, F. Ghira, B. Leonardy, D. S. Buchanan, (W. J. Baden), M. Govengreen, R. A. Jackson, Josh Cardy, J. B. Jackson, Herrmann Weissbred, Chas Wright, J. W. Canning, ( ? ), Jno T. Lesley, Francis M. Robles, H. S. Snodgrass, (Duff Yost), Thos. P. Kennedy, W. J. Allen, James Henry, Philip,Collins, (Robert Gommary), H. R. Benjamin, Geo. L. Calloway, Orlando D. Thayer, E. P. Holmes, A. Ross, Dan Mather, (George F. Barslow), (Copl 3rd Arty), Frank W. Hess, Capt. 3rd U. S. Arty, Adolphus Russel, U. S. Sch. Matchless, Edward S. Millar, 2nd Lt. 3rd U.S. Art., William McCarthy, Charles Kavanagh, James Johnstone, James Shaw, John J. McCarthy, Vincent S. Rol, William Moran, John Neaven, Thomas McDairmant, Laeo Schnurr, John Shelly, Edward Robinson, (William Hnitte), Albert Kherle, James Jennings, ( ? ), Frank O.. Ferris, James T. Magbee.
|
HOW IT ALL STARTED - SPAIN CEDES FLORIDA TO THE U.S. BY TREATY
|
A BRIEF HISTORY OF FORT BROOKE Fort Brooke was established in response to the Treaty of Moultrie Creek--an agreement negotiated between the new American government in Florida and the Seminole tribes in 1823, calling for the removal of the Indians to the southern part of the state. Millions of acres in central Florida from Ocala to Charlotte Harbor were set aside for an Indian reservation. The Federal government decided to establish a string of forts in various parts of South Florida to police the area and keep the Indians down. A military post was suggested for the Tampa Bay area to "protect" the Seminoles from outside influences, to forestall the introduction of weapons from Cuba, and to serve as a station for the Indians to obtain rations and supplies. Late that year Col. George Mercer Brooke, comfortably situated at Fort Clinch near Pensacola, was ordered to Tampa Bay. For hundreds of years earlier, the Seminoles referred to the area by its topography--they called it cotan' chobî, a contraction of the phrase cotanî chobî--a phrase that meant "the big place where the water meets the land." In English, we write "Cotanchobee" pronounced "Co-tawn-cho-bee."
ABOUT G. M. BROOKE
GADSDEN ARRIVES FIRST,
CHOOSES SITE
James Gadsden, aide-de-camp
to General Jackson during the Florida campaign of 1818. He played a
later role in the history of the Seminoles by negotiating the Treaty of
Payne's Landing (1832).
|
GEORGE MERCER BROOKE
The photo above is a portrait of George Mercer Brooke (1785-1851)United States Army, which was presented to Gen. Sumter L. Lowry, chairman of the Sesquicentennial, Dinner of the Tampa Historical Society, by Col. George M. Brooke, Jr. During the years Brooke was at the cantonment, his family life was scarred by tragedy. His wife was with him part of the time, but she was plagued by ill health. In January 1824 at the very time Brooke and his troops were clearing away the dense undergrowth on the shores of Hillsborough Bay, Mrs. Brooke, presumably at Pensacola, gave birth to her third child, a boy. A fourth child, John Mercer Brooke, the first resident to be born in Tampa, was born at the cantonment on 18 December 1826. That was a critical time at the post. That very day Brooke had received several desperate letters from Governor Duval describing a new crisis with the Indians, and in response he was fitting for combat two companies of soldiers who had just arrived. Because of Mrs. Brooke’s failing health, her husband took her to Pensacola in February 1827. He returned to his command, but when she failed to respond to treatment, he obtained sixty days’ leave from General Gaines with permission to apply to the Commanding General for an additional six months. Brooke made the request for the extension on the grounds of his wife’s condition, his own health which was "very much impaired," and the fact that he had "not been on furlough for ten years." Brooke was granted the furlough. In October the following year, 1828, he sustained his greatest loss. In stark words he related the tragedy. "I have lately been visited by the heaviest calamity which a father and husband can feel. Whilst in Ma. my family was attacked by a most violent bilious fever, which has taken from me two of my beloved children (my daughter and eldest son). My wife’s life was despaired of for some time and in her illness (she) gave birth to a dead son. She is most unhappy and wretched and wishes me to come on." Brooke was granted another furlough. Of Brooke’s eight children, only two, John Mercer Brooke and William Neverson Brooke, lived to maturity. The latter never married. John Mercer Brooke, the one born at Cantonment Brooke, served with distinction in the United Stales Navy and later in the Confederate Slates Navy of which he was Chief of Ordnance. Lucy Brooke died in 1829 at the age of thirty-five and the old soldier never remarried. In early 1829, Brooke became a brigadier general and was transferred North, leaving this key outpost that was destined to play a major role in the Seminole Wars. In 1831 Brooke was promoted to Colonel and transferred north of the Ohio River where he took command of the Fifth Infantry Regiment with headquarters at Fort Mackinac, Michigan Territory. The Fifth Infantry remained in the northwest until the Mexican War. Brooke died in 1851 at San Antonio, Texas, as a brevet major general in command of the Department of Texas.
|
||
CONSTRUCTION OF THE FORT It took many months to secure the needed building supplies, equipment and provisions, and the colonel was in no hurry to face the challenge of the mosquito-ridden wilderness. Brooke and his five-ship convoy arrived with four companies of militia in late January 1824, and began building the cantonment. "We found a jungle-like land with giant live oaks spreading enormous limbs as big as tree trunks, hung with pendants of Spanish moss and yellow jassamine," he wrote in his journal. Brooke spent the first month landing supplies, clearing the “worst undergrowth he had ever seen," and planting gardens. HACKLEY PROPERTY SEIZED By March of 1824, the troops had realized what a comfortable house Hackley had erected and taking advantage of his absence on a trip to Pensacola, they seized the house from an agent of Hackley named Rhodes and put it to use as officers’ quarters. It was difficult for Hackley to oppose the claim of the troops for they occupied much of the land he claimed, erecting barracks, parade grounds and store houses.
Hackley was promptly dispossessed of
his land by Col. Brooke and was thereafter unsuccessful in attempts to
reclaim his plantation, having lost his rights to it in 1821 with
the Transcontinental Treaty, by which Spain ceded East Florida to the
United States. (See the story of Levi Coller,
Dr. Robert Jackson and Hyde
Park.) FORT BROOKE COMPLETED The fort was finished by September 1824 and stood where Florida Avenue and Eunice streets intersect to the area around Franklin St. and Platt in today's downtown Tampa. Brooke wrote that the Indians appeared "to be more and more displeased with the limited land of their reservation in the center of the state." A marker near the Platt Street Bridge marks the company's landing. Part of the reservation was a beautiful place with orange and lime trees planted by Hackley. There were several springs, a winding creek and an Indian mound. Although there were two small springs located near the barracks, the soldiers depended upon a large spring located in present day Ybor City for water supplies. Despite this, there were few soldiers sent to Fort Brooke in the period from 1827-1834 and at one time was virtually abandoned. Meanwhile, outside the reservation, early settlers came and established a tiny village that later became the metropolis of Tampa. The settlers had close ties with the garrison, providing the soldiers with fresh vegetables and fruit until their gardens produced, and Cuban fishermen such as Maximo Hernandez provided fish and succulent turtle steaks.
|
|||
|
Maps of Fort Brooke, 1838
Above map modified from this Tribune 2016 article by Rodney Kite-Powell
|
Fort Brooke was one of the largest military establishments in the United States when this map was made in January, 1838. Legend: 1-Judge Augustus Steele’s home and out-buildings. 2-Indian dwellings. 3-James Lynch’s home and store. 4-United States cemetery. 5-Hospital buildings. 6-Sutler’s store. 7-Bakehouse. 8-Commissary buildings. 9-Horse sheds. 10- Quartermaster buildings. 11-Principal wharf. 12-Carpenter’s shop. 13-Allen’s store. 14-Flag pole. 15-Blacksmith shop. 16-Ordinance department buildings and Major Frazer’s redoubt. 17-Clothing department. 18-Uncovered marquees. 19-Prisoners’pen. 20-Major Frazer’s quarters. 21-Leut. McCrab’s quarters. 22-Capt. Evan’s quarters. 23-Covered marquees. 24-Horse shelter. 25-Barracks. 26-Uncovered marquees. 27-Horse shelter. 28-Cemetery. 29-German Dragoons. |
FORT BROOKE DURING THE SEMINOLE WARS During the first Seminole War (1835-42) more than 3,000 soldiers were stationed in the 16-mile-square reservation. It served as Army Headquarters for that war and the later Seminole war (1855-58). Because of its proximity to the water, Fort Brooke was the chief supply depot for troops in Florida. During the Second Seminole War 1835-1842, there were 4,000 or more troops at Fort Brooke and the numerous buildings were kept in good condition. Fort Brooke was the most important fort in Florida during the Second Seminole War but its utility decreased in later years. Six years after the war had ended, the buildings had fallen into such bad shape that Colonel John T. Sprague complained that two buildings were in a condition that was dangerous. Three
images below from same map at Library of Congress:
|
TAMPA'S REVIVAL
FORT BROOKE RESERVATION REDUCED
Below is a crop of the county survey of Township 29 south, Ranges 18 east and 19 east showing the entire area of the military reserve by surveyor Charles F. Hopkins in March, 1852. Outlined in blue are the original limits of the military reserve. The ladle-shaped area outlined in green shows the reduced Ft. Brooke reservation. The red numbers are the size of the outlined tract of land in acres. The red outline shows the 160 acres obtained by Hillsborough County for the county seat.
|
||||
The location
of the plaque today.
|
SKETCHES OF FORT BROOKE IN THE
1840s
|
General view of Fort Brooke and parade grounds 1845, by Juliet Lay Axtell Thanks to the artistic talents of Juliet Lay Axtell, one of the Army Chaplain Axtell's daughters, who at the age of 12 sketched this view of Fort Brooke. At the time, the garrison consisted of 20 whitewashed buildings with Col. Wm. G. Belknap in command. The large building at the left of the flagpole was the commanding officer's headquarters. The small buildings to the right at a distance were the soldiers' quarters. The line of buildings from the Adjutant's office to the Indian mound was known as "Bachelor's Row" because the buildings were occupied by unmarried officers of the post. The mound with the Chinese pavilion on its crest and encircled by a fence appears to the right of the large oak tree. The Captain's quarters and the post chapel are at the right. The flagpole and cannons mark the parade grounds where the mounting of the guards were held every morning and the site of many grand parades.
|
|
THE HURRICANE OF SEPT 25, 1848
At right, the old structure seen so often in articles about Fort Brooke, described as the officer's quarters which was originally built by Robert Hackley as his home. DID HACKLEY'S HOME SURVIVE THE HURRICANE? A letter from Maj. R.D.S. Wade notes: "Very severe storm from the SE, destroyed all the wharves and most of the public buildings at the fort. Storm began about 0800 from the SE and raged until 1600 when winds veered to the S and SW until weakening around 2000. The storm was most intense between 1300 and 1500. Flooding was exceptionally great, no lives were lost at Ft. Brooke." Observations from the post surgeon at Ft. Brooke wrote: "Tide rose 15 feet above low water, water rose very fast between 1000 and 1400. Barometer fell from 1020 mb at 0900 on the 24th and 1013 mb at 2100, to 954 mb prior to 1500 on the 25th. By 1500 on the 25th, barometer rose to 967 mb and winds were from the South."
In James McKay I, the Scottish Chief of Tampa Bay, " Sunland Tribune: Vol. 8 , Article 2, Tony Pizzo wrote:
In "Tampa Town, 1824–1886: the Cracker Village with a Latin Accent," (1968) Tony Pizzo wrote:
In "Some Observations Concerning the History of Fort Brooke and Tampa," Sunland Tribune: Vol. 22 , Article 6 at USF Library's Scholar Commons. James W. Covington wrote:
In "The Greatest Gale Ever Known - Tampa and the Hurricane of 1848," The Sunland Tribune Volume XXIV 1998 at the USF Digital Collections, Canter Brown Jr. wrote:
In History of Hillsborough County, Florida, Narrative and Biographical, 1928, Ernest L. Robinson wrote:
It appears that Hackley's house didn't survive the hurricane, or at least was damaged badly enough to require practically rebuilt in its entirety. So the house seen in the photo of the "Officers' Quarters" was, for the most part, built in 1848. Read more about this hurricane in the feature about James T. Magbee here at TampaPix.
|
Thirty-five citizens of Manatee (Bradenton) sent a letter to the Secretary of War pointing out that the people of Tampa did not want the fort because they wanted the land for a town site. The Manatee people listed the good points of a Manatee River location including a nine foot deep water channel. Somehow, however, their request was denied but the Fort Brooke area was reduced in size and influence. When the people of Tampa did get most of the military reservation for a town site, the military saw little hope for further use for the base. By August, 1850, Major David Twiggs wrote that the post of Fort Brooke was to be broken up and the chaplain transferred to Camp Twiggs, Miss. Yet, the post remained opened used as headquarters for the Indian emigration agent (Thomas P. Kennedy) during the 1850s and played a fairly important role in the last Seminole War 1855-1858.
|
THE JAMES MCKAY FAMILY
|
FORT BROOKE DURING THE CIVIL WAR After military units were transferred from Fort Brooke
in 1858, the place was leased to Captain James McKay but his stay was
interrupted first by Confederate and then Union troops. When the fort
was occupied by the Confederates, the place was bombarded several times
by Union warships. This small battle consisted of a Union gunboat firing upon Tampa in hopes of a confederate surrender, yet the Union army quickly ceased fire without the surrender it had sought. In 1863, the Battle of Fort Brooke took place in which two more Union gunboats fired upon the fort as part of a diversion, so that a group of soldiers could find and destroy Confederate vessels and blockade runners. Upon realizing the plan, a group of confederates found and attacked the Union soldiers resulting in casualties.
On May 6, 1864, both Fort Brooke and Tampa were captured by Union Forces. At the end of the Civil War and the beginning of Reconstruction, Fort Brooke was occupied by federal troops until 1869.
|
||||||||
By 1873, the buildings were unoccupied and James McKay was given a lease to use the wharf and one-half of the warehouse for his cattle shipping operations. Captain McKay at this time had the largest fleet of schooners and steamers in the state of Florida. KEY WEST TROOPS
RELOCATED TO FORT BROOKE RESERVATION REDUCED In 1877 the size of the reservation was reduced. The military authorities regained control of Fort Brooke when the President of the United States set aside in January 22, 1877 and May 29, 1878, one hundred and fifty-five acres for military purposes with the remaining land kept in the public domain, which became known as the town of Fort Brooke.
KEY WEST TROOPS HOUSED
AT FORT BROOKE During the time that the post had been deserted, people of Tampa had roamed through the deserted post removing windows and doors, and carrying away boards and bricks for use in their homes. Such removals were commonplace. Insult was added to injury at Fort Brooke when citizens deposited their night soil on the grounds. FORT BROOKE INSPECTED One who became concerned about the condition of the area was Charles Hanford who commanded the Union troops at the fort when they occupied the place. He noted the grass and weed-ridden cemetery noting, "No longer is it a fit resting place for soldiers." The cemetery, one-fourth of an acre square was located one-fourth of a mile from the reduced military reservation. In response to Charles Hanford's letter to the Army command, $200 was spent by the Quartermaster Corps to improve the conditions. In an inventory of the standing buildings made during the 1870s the following valuation was made: officer’s quarters, 85 x 46, $3,000; barracks, 110 x 50, $1500; hospital, 42 x 30, $500; mess hall, 50 x 25, $500; bake house, 50 x 25, $300; storehouse, $50; commissary, $100; flag staff, $500; four wooden cisterns, $480 and boardwalk, $50, making a grand total of $7,180.4 Captain Jacob Rawles of the Fifth Artillery made a thorough inspection of the one hundred and fifty-five acres with its rundown buildings, Indian mound, scattered live oak and orange trees, dock, cemetery, springs, winding creek and thick woods to the east of the buildings. In his report dated September, 1880, Rawles noted that there were no storehouses at all on the site. Quartermaster supplies for the troops from Key West were either placed under tents or in an old log stable and food stored in an old guard house building. Officers’ quarters likewise in poor condition, consisted of one building containing a hall and four rooms on the first floor, and four attic rooms on the second. Two kitchens to prepare food for the officers were located twenty feet from the building, but under a common roof that needed shingles. Only one large wooden building served as housing for the artillerymen from Key West. The doors and windows had been stolen and the sills under them were in a rotten state. New floors and a roof were needed. The hospital consisted of a small wooden building which contained a dispensary, beds for twelve patients and erected nearby was the kitchen. On December 24, 1880 the Secretary of War authorized the expenditure of one thousand dollars for the repair of the buildings and detailed sketches of proposed barracks buildings planned for Fort Brooke can be found in the military records at the National Archives. KEY WEST TROOPS LEAVE FORT BROOKE, POST IS DECOMMISSIONED
The troops from Key West remained in Tampa from May 1880 until 1882 when they were transferred during the "sick season" to St. Augustine and Mount Vernon, Alabama. The last roll call of soldiers occurred in 1882 and the last soldiers were shipped out in December the same year. The post was decommissioned by the US Army in 1883. In 1883 the War Department relinquished title to the the General Land Office of the Interior Department and the reservation was opened to homestead applications at the Federal Land Office. The 20 or more bodies in the Fort Brooke Cemetery were moved to Barrancas National Cemetery at Pensacola. As a result of the disclosure of the closing of the cemetery, it is clear that in the 1850s Tampa had three or more cemeteries, one for the military, one for the older Tampa families - Oak Lawn - and at least one for the Indians and those who for one reason or the other could not be placed in the other two.
Soldiers standing at attention in camp at Fort Brooke. Samuel P. Burgert (who was an itinerant photographer) and wife Addie (parents of all the Burgert Bros.) were still living in Ohio in 1880. Somewhere around 1882 to 1886, Samuel moved his family to Jacksonville, Florida. Webb's Jacksonville city directory for 1884 through 1888 listed S.P. Burgert as a photographer at 71 & 1/2 Bay St, with the latter years also listing him as a crayon artist at the same address, and his home at 4th and Helen. Samuel traveled around the state for photographic opportunities. Some early photos of Tampa taken in the mid to late 1880s with the Burgert signature mark (not the Burgert Bros. logo) are evidence that Samuel may have made trips to Tampa in those years. The Burgert family moved to Tampa around 1896 to 1897. Over the years in Tampa, the Burgert brothers did buy out other photographers photos, some of which may have been taken in the early 1880s. The Burgert Brothers commercial photography business, consisting of Al and Jean Burgert, was founded in 1917. See this Sunland Tribune article concerning the Burgert's "Relic" photograph collection, photos/negatives they bought from other photographers "Finding Relics in the Burgert Brothers Photographs," by Bill Harris, Sunland Tribune: Vol. 34 , Article 6. Learn more about the Burgert family of photographers at TampaPix
|
THE FINAL BATTLE FOR FORT BROOKE BEGINS | |||||
|
|||||
TAMPA WANTS THE LAND
FOR A PARK
JOHN
T. LESLEY AND TAMPA'S PLAN
Accordingly, Dr. Edmund S. Carew and J. A. Carlisle of Gainesville were selected by the Senator. On March 19, 1883, Carew filed for homestead on the entire tract and Carlisle made the cash entry. On the same day, Call telegraphed Lesley to proceed with the preemption. The cash payments of Carew and Carlisle were not accepted until late on March 22, when a plat of the land was received from the General Land Office in Washington. They had been advised by Senator Call of when the plat had been sent and so were prepared to make the payments within five minutes of its arrival in Gainesville. They were also instructed by Call to use his funds to pay the $421.00 entry money and homestead application fee. Call relayed this information to Lesley, who immediately paid the Gainesville men's draft on the Senator's account. Clifford Herrick, a 23-year-old store clerk from Michigan, was apparently the man selected by Lesley and his associates to fulfill their "end" of Senator Call's plan. He filed for preemption on March 26, alleging in his required statement that he made settlement and began improvements on the land five days earlier. The third man to claim the Fort Brooke land was old Louis Bell, who asserted his settlement rights by filing for preemption on March 30. Call termed his claim to the entire tract a "Land Office trick," and was sure that he would "not be allowed to claim more than the single lot he has asked for repeatedly."
|
JOHN THOMAS LESLEY There were few aspects in the life of the young community of Tampa that Capt. John Thomas Lesley (1835-1913) did not touch in some significant way. At the age of 25, Lesley had already become one of Tampa’s leading citizens. Born in Madison County, Florida, John Lesley moved to Tampa with his family in 1848. During the Third Seminole War, Lesley joined the Florida militia as a private but quickly was promoted to lieutenant. At the outbreak of the War Between the States, he formed a company of Tampa men and was elected its captain. In October 1862, Lesley was commissioned a major in the Confederate Army. At the end of the war, Lesley returned to Tampa where he worked to establish his financial and social position. During the next several years, Lesley served as sheriff for two years and built a sawmill that supplied much of the lumber used to re-build the town. He later became a cattle rancher and state legislator. At the end of 1865, Tampa resembled a ghost town. The majority of residents had left the city during the war; the economic condition was dismal and there was no municipal government. The election of Edward Clarke as mayor on October 25, 1866 was unable to substantially improve conditions. Clarke’s administration was confronted with an empty treasury, yellow fever epidemics and frequent unrest in the city. The situation worsened with arrival of federal troops and administrators to impose the Reconstruction policies established by the U.S. Congress. Deeply resented by the population, soldiers and federal civil authorities were subjected to frequent harassment. In response, both federal military and civil authorities used their position to make life even more miserable for the resident population. The antagonism between federal authorities and Tampa residents was the foundation for John Lesley’s mayoral campaign in early 1869. He campaigned on a single platform that Tampa’s charter should be revoked by the state legislature due to the City’s destitute financial condition. The majority of residents agreed and Lesley was elected mayor on March 1, 1869. While a city clerk, treasurer and a city council was elected, the Lesley Administration did little more than wait until the state legislature revoked Tampa’s Charter due to an inactive government. On October 4, 1869, the state legislature responded as expected and revoked the City’s charter. When the news reached Tampa, Lesley and other City officials resigned their positions. The Hillsborough County government appropriated all City properties and assumed responsibility for providing educational and other principal services to Tampa’s residents. Tampa’s status as a non-chartered city continued until August 1873 when residents voted to re-incorporate the city. After resigning, Lesley returned to his business ventures. In 1872, he sold his lumber mill to raise cattle for the lucrative Cuban market and accumulated a fortune. Lesley was also one of the founders of the First National Bank and the Tampa Electric Company which, in 1887, installed the first electric traffic lights in Tampa. In 1876, Lesley was elected to the state Legislature and was re-elected in 1882 and 1886. He later campaigned and won a seat in the state senate and was one of the members of the constitutional convention that drafted the present state constitution. In a life that spanned 78 years, Lesley saw Tampa grow from an outpost on the edge of the frontier to a bustling community on the verge of becoming a major Florida city. He has been described by Donald J. Ivey as "Tampa's Pioneer Renaissance Man", in an excellent attempt at the only biography of Lesley that's ever been written.
John Thomas Lesley - 12th Mayor of
Tampa Ivey, Donald J. (2018) "John T. Lesley: Tampa's Pioneer Renaissance Man," Sunland Tribune: Vol. 21, Article 3. |
||||
CAREW THROWS A CURVE BALL Carew arrived with his family in April of 1883 to take up residence in the vacated officers' quarters near the present intersection of Platt and Franklin Streets. It is unclear from available records why Dr. Carew established his home on the reservation. He was supposedly informed beforehand that his homestead was only a means to prevent speculation on the land. It was to be turned over to the people of Tampa as represented by Lesley and his friends. Neither Carew nor Carlisle used his own money in the process, but rather that of Senator Call, and indirectly that of John T. Lesley. Furthermore, Carew paid only the $20.00 register and receiver's fee, while Carlisle paid the crucial $421.00 entry money. A partial answer to this question of why Carew established his home on the land may be found in the testimony of Lesley at an 1889 hearing called by order of the Secretary of the Interior. Lesley claimed that an agreement was reached with Carew on the advice of members of the town council and other prominent citizens. It was decided that after six months the reservation would be divided into six parts. The town of Tampa was to make its selection first, with that lot to be used as a public park. The other sections would then be divided among William B. Henderson, John A. Henderson, Stephen M. Sparkman, John T. Lesley, and Dr. Carew. According to Lesley, he was astonished when Carew later rejected the terms of their oral agreement. The doctor said that he was the only man who had any rights to the land and he intended to hold it. It is not clear when this understanding was reached. The report of the hearing officers indicated that it was prior to the March 22 homestead. Yet, the agreement was made between Lesley and Carew, who had no contact or correspondence before that date. If Carew was a party to this arrangement before March 22, or if he originally thought he was homesteading for Senator Call (as Lesley once claimed he had admitted), his homestead application would have involved perjury. By law, an affidavit was signed by each applicant wherein he swore that he was neither acting as an agent for, nor "in collusion with any person, corporation or syndicate to give them the benefit of the land entered." At the hearing, officers concluded that at the time of his filing, Carew was acting as an agent of Senator Call. He did not file in good faith for the purpose of making the land his home, but rather under an agreement to donate some of the land to the town of Tampa and hold the remainder jointly with several other persons. Meanwhile, others who wanted the land erected tents and shacks on desired tracts, but soon businessmen purchased lots driving out the intruders, tearing down the ruined buildings and erecting buildings that served as bases for the many firms that were moving to Tampa. |
|
Location of the John T. Lesley house
|
When Carew announced his determination to settle all of the land, Lesley and his associates concentrated on advancing Clifford Herrick's claim. The strength of this claim was the fact that Herrick's settlement date was one day prior to Carew's homestead. John S. Turner, a Virginia attorney selected by Senator Call, warned Lesley that it was "very important that Herrick's settlement and beginning of improvements should be fixed on March 21." He was confident that Stephen M. Sparkman, Tampa's future U.S. Representative, would see to the proper date. Sparkman had in fact telegraphed Lesley when Herrick was still in Gainesville to "continue improvements," and to have "Clifford keep off all trespassers." Attorney Turner felt that Herrick had the "inside track," and Call reported that the Secretary of the Interior felt that the Carew and Bell claims were inferior. Nevertheless, there was apparently some reason to question the strength of Herrick's preemption. Turner thought it possible that Carew could cast doubt on the genuine nature of the claim. He also feared that Herrick might "go back on us and make a more profitable arrangement to himself by making a clean breast of it." Perhaps one of these contingencies was realized, for Herrick's claim is not considered in later Department of the Interior case reviews. |
||
EVERYBODY LOSES--FOR NOW
On April 2, 1883, the commissioner of
the General Land Office ordered the local land office to accept no more
applications for homestead or preemption. The subsequent attempts of Frank
Jones, Daniel Mather, Julius Caesar, Andrew Stillings, and Enoch B.
Chamberlain to file for all or part of the land were rejected. This was
doubtlessly an unexpected development, and the unsuccessful applicants
requested an appeal. After reviewing the case, the commissioner reiterated
his decision in December, 1883. He held that the land was not, and never had
been subject to homesteading or preemption. Because it lay adjacent to a
town, the tract had a greatly enhanced value over agricultural lands
normally available for homesteading. The commissioner concluded therefore that it was in
the public interest that everyone have an equal opportunity to purchase
lots. He ordered that the only proper method of disposal was by a public
sale, and the claims of Carew, Herrick, and Bell must be cancelled. The
commissioner's decision was upheld by Interior Secretary Henry M. Teller.
|
||
Senator Call's proposed bill proposed Tampa would get lots 8, 9 and 10 of section 24 donated and that up to 10 acres of it to be set apart as a park to be kept in order and open to the public. The remainder of the land, excluding streets, alleys and avenues, be granted to Tampa for the purpose of free, public schools "to the benefit of all children of school age, without distinction of race. The proposed bill also provided for single lots to be sold at auction for public sale by Tampa in 10 years, the purchase price going to the school board for teachers' pay and upkeep of the schools. Finally, it provided for the sale of land no larger than 20 acres as settlement of any pending claims or litigation for any part of the land.
|
|
The Tampa Journal was for S. A. Jone's proposal, known as the "Plumb Bill" seen below. |
|
|
|
THE HACKLEYS REENTER THE DISPUTE Below from: Lewis, Jeffrey (1982) "How Tampa Lost the Fort Brooke Military Reservation" USF Library Digital Collections Ex Libris 5, Summer 1982. Two more important claimants emerged to compound the confusion. In September 1887, the heirs of Robert J. Hackley, the settler thrown off the site by Col. Brooke 63 years before, claimed the right of preemption and purchase. They argued that Hackley was guaranteed this right by an act of Congress in 1826, and upon his death it was transferred to them. THE AMENDED CHARTER CHANGES TAMPA'S INCORPORATE LIMITS, BUT DID IT REALLY CHANGE RIGHTS TO FORT BROOKE LAND? Jeffrey Lewis, in "How Tampa Lost the Fort Brooke Military Reservation, states that in 1889 an act of the State Legislature created the new City of Tampa and extended its incorporate limits to cover the reservation. On this basis the city maintained that it was entitled to the lands for use as a public park. Below, the amended charter passed on June 5, 1889, was presented in the Tampa Journal of Jun. 27th. The article states that there was only "a slight change in the boundary lines."
Below in GREEN is an approximate mapping of the description above. The approximate boundary points of Tampa's original charter are shown in PINK. The RED outline is the original 160 acre tract given to Hillsborough County on which establish the county seat. The purple line is the South Fla. Railroad track.
As can be seen below, the 1889 coordinates follow the 1887 coordinates EXACTLY except where the boundary follows the original 1845 boundary southward to the Fort Brooke boundary (Whiting St.) At that point, the 1889 boundary follows the line of Whiting street just a short distance more before it takes a turn to the east (See inside the yellow oval.) The 1887 boundary turned east at the point where the eastern border of the original 160 acres (red outline) intersected Whiting St. (See enlargement after this map below.)
in 1845 in which to establish the county seat. The light blue area represents the Fort Brooke land.
BOTH CHARTERS' BOUNDARIES INCLUDED THE FT. BROOKE LAND
It's rather clear that the boundary change WAS indeed slight, as the Journal article said, so there was no greater basis to argue ownership of Ft. Brooke land due to geographic incorporation boundary changes than there was before the 1889 charter revision.
THE BATTLE RAGES ON - Sen. Call vs. Rep. Plumb
HACKLEY AND BELL CLAIMS DEEMED SUPERIOR TO CAREW'S AND TAMPA'S Late in that year a hearing was held before the officers of the local land office to determine the character of the various claims. They ruled that the claim of the Hackley heirs was superior to all others. Hackley was the first settler and had twice attempted to regain the land by filing a claim of right of preemption. The claim of the heirs of Louis Bell, who died on the reservation in 1885, was found to be worthy of consideration, but only because of Bell's "good character." They reported that the homestead and entry of Dr. Carew was not made for the purpose of establishing a home and therefore was invalid. The claim of the City of Tampa was rejected since the rights of any legitimate settler could not be affected by a later incorporation. The officers recommended to the commissioner of the General Land Office that the cases of all the claimants except those of the Bell and Hackley heirs be cancelled. All other persons living on the reservation land through 1883 were squatters, as the land was never legally opened to homesteading. APPEAL TO COMMISSIONER CANCELS BELL'S CLAIM The decisions of the local officers were appealed to the commissioner, who upheld them except in regard to the heirs of Louis Bell. He felt that if the Hackley claim was allowed, all others must be denied. The Hackley heirs alone at this juncture would be able to perfect their claim and have all of the land awarded to them.
In a letter to the Tampa Journal on Dec. 17, 1890, Silas Jones aired his argument against the Hackley heirs' claims. He began by listing sections of the law which set the requirements for claiming the former military reservation lands, then goes on to describe the circumstances where the Hackleys failed to comply with any of the laws. About twenty lines of text are obscured from the article by a stray piece from another page.
APPEAL TO SECRETARY JOHN NOBLE REVERSES HACKLEY JUDGMENT Once again an appeal was requested, and the entire matter came before Secretary of the Interior John W. Noble in November 1892. He agreed that the Carew homestead was not made in good faith, and that the claims of the other settlers or their heirs were also properly rejected. However, he went on to reverse the judgment for the Hackley heirs. The act of Congress in 1826 under which they claimed specifically exempted military reservations from those lands it made available for preemption and purchase. Furthermore, this act was not in effect during the time of Hackley's settlement. The appropriate law in force at that time made any settler upon the lands of the United States either a tenant at will or a trespasser. Hackley was the latter. As his settlement was illegal, he had no rights to the land which could descend to his heirs.
|
THE CANNON* AT TAMPA'S PLANT PARK Originally part of a battery of three 24-lb. shot cannon mounted on Barbette Carriages and placed in the year 1861 near the northeast corner of the mouth of the Hillsborough River, these two were used to defend Tampa and Fort Brooke during the Civil War. On May 5th, 1864, Federal Troops composed of elements of the 2nd US Colored Regiment, 2nd Florida cavalry, US Sailors and Florida Union (irregular troops) landing south and east of Tampa, enveloped Tampa in a pincers movement and captured it by surprise. The 24-pounders were disabled by breaking off a trunnion and destroying their barbette carriages. The indentation on the barrel of one of these 24-pounders indicates that a 6-pounder was fired point blank at its barrel. The two smaller 6-pound shot size cannon were then carried away and taken to Key West. *CANNON is both singular and plural
|
|
|
|
BATTERIES OF TAMPA
Since these cannon were placed in Fort Brooke before the Civil War, they originally pointed inland to defend against Indian attacks.
The cannon's naval
mounts used here were designed and funded by the Fort Brooke Commission.
The historical recreation of Plant's garden folly was a project of the
Friends of Plant Park in 2008. The plaque is placed
on pieces of limestone salvaged from the original wall of Plant's
"Spanish Fort."
If H. B. Plant originally displayed the cannon over "a wall" (singular) like the plaque says, then this photo below from Tony Pizzo's Tampa Town 1824–1886: Cracker Village with a Latin Accent, pub.1968, was a design that replaced Plant's original one because this doesn't appear to be "a wall." (Or possibly, Plant's original wall between the two cannon was removed at some point before this photo.) The cannon below does appear to rest on limestone blocks the same as the pieces on which the plaque is currently displayed.
|
|
The "General Noble" Giant Sequoia
was named for this Secretary of the Interior.
See photos and read about its interesting history. |
LAND RIGHTS JUST AS CLOUDED AS WHEN IT STARTED Secretary Noble's decision in Nov. 1892 effectively meant that the status of the reservation was the same as when it was abandoned by the Department of War. The land would be sold at public auction at whatever date the Secretary deemed proper. For differing reasons, few in Tampa were satisfied with this state of affairs. The land was never made available for public sale, but within a short time seventeen applicants including Dr. Edmund Carew from Gainesville who moved into the officer’s quarters, claimed land and squatters settled on the reservation with their tar paper and wooden shacks, tents and huts. Some lots in this area sold for eleven dollars an acre. Thus, a town known as Fort Brooke was organized on Tampa’s borders. |
The Descriptive Pamphlet of Hillsborough County (1885) stated that the land's natural beauty was "marred by the fences which have been erected around and through" what was to have been an attractive public recreation area. The clouded title to such a valuable tract, with frontage on both the river and the bay, was an impediment to the town's growth. The development of the port was especially hindered. Finally, none of the claimants had been able to gain a clear title, and the years of confusion added much bitterness. CHARGES OF DOUBLE-CROSSING MADE In this atmosphere it was charged that Senator Call had double-crossed the town. It was implied that there was something dishonestly secretive about Call's correspondence with Dr. Carew. A later author also cited the fact that Dr. Carew received the homestead application and entry money from the Senator to suggest that Call may have intended to obtain the land for himself. Both of these surmises are quite questionable. The plan to use Carew and Carlisle was known to Lesley and other prominent Tampans by March 19 at the latest. On that date Lesley received a telegram from Call notifying him that the two men were ready to act. While it is true that the Senator's money was used initially, it appears that this was done for the sake of expediency. The petition signed by 165 Tampa residents asking Congress to transfer the Fort Brooke Military Reservation to the town of Tampa for use as a park was dated November 13, 1882. He wrote Lesley that, "There was no time to be lost, and all these several methods of defeating the land ring" were necessary. Call assured him that his role in the matter was "without any personal interest and solely in pursuance of your wishes." Indeed, Call was involved for years in the effort to have the Fort Brooke land granted to the town. |
SECRETARY NOBLE'S DECISION APPEALED, GENERAL LAND OFFICE RULING DEEMED IMPROPER The judgment of Secretary Noble, which was favorable to none of the claimants, was appealed to his successor Hoke Smith. Secretary Smith ruled that the order of the commissioner of the General Land Office to accept no more applications for homestead or preemption after April 2, 1883, and to cancel all previous claims, was not proper. Although the commissioner had the authority to dispose of the lands either by public sale or under the homestead and preemption laws, once an entry had been allowed under one method he could not opt for the other. The revocation of the order of April 2 necessitated the re-examination of all applications before and after that date. Dr. Carew had died on the last day of 1886 and his widow remained in the officer's quarters. Lizzie Carew continued to press the claim as heir to her husband, but limited it to two of the seven lots into which the land had been divided. |
Michael Hoke Smith (Sep. 2, 1855 – November 27, 1931) was a newspaper owner, United States Secretary of the Interior (1893-1896), 58th Governor of Georgia (1907-1909,1911), and a United States Senator (1911-1920) from Georgia.
|
SILAS JONES STARTS A NEW NEWSPAPER--THE TAMPA TIMES EARLY TAMPA NEWSPAPER HISTORY Newspapering in Tampa began in the days preceding the Civil War when M. Whit Smith and the Rev. Cooley Sumner Reynolds began planning the establishment of a newspaper here in 1853. On Jan. 10, 1854, the first issue of the TAMPA HERALD appeared.
Smith sold his interest in the Herald in November, 1854, to Dr. J. S. Jones. Throughout his life, Cooley Reynolds, a member of the well-known Brandon family, was torn between two callings, his clerical duties first and foremost, and as a writer and publisher, second. After the Civil War, Reynolds turned up in Clearwater and there in 1873 he established the city’s first newspaper, the Clear Water Times. Also involved in the publishing of Tampa’s first newspaper, the Herald, was Henry A. Crane. The newsman left Tampa and joined the Union forces in Key West during the Civil War, while his son, Judge H. L. Crane, served as a Confederate soldier through the conflict. When Dr. J. S. Jones took over the Tampa Herald he changed its name to the Florida Peninsular and in August, 1855, sold it to Simon Turman, Jr., saying in the editorial column that he was forced to sell because "it did not pay sufficient to support my family.” Three years later William J. Spencer bought an interest in the paper.
One editor of the Peninsular under publisher Spencer was Alfonso DeLaunay, who served as Tampa's first Postmaster. He left the paper in early 1860 and was succeeded by Simon Turman, Jr. DeLaunay immediately started to seek backing for a new paper which he got from his brother, St. John DeLaunay, and O. C. Drew, who became the publishers of THE SUNNY SOUTH which hit the streets on Jan. 29, 1861.
Because of the Civil War, the Florida Peninsular was forced to suspend publication on May 25, 1861. During the war the Peninsular's press and type were taken into the country so the Yankees could not find them When the war ended, the equipment was brought back to Tampa and publication was resumed on April 28, 1866 by William Spencer’s two brothers, John Edward and Thomas K. Spencer. A couple of months later, John Spencer became ill. He had contracted dysentery while serving in the Florida Volunteers. He died June 30, 1866. Thomas Spencer carried on the paper, which was Democratic.
Information combined from:
|
|||||||||||
RE-EXAMINATION OF CLAIMS BY
SECRETARY SMITH IN 1894 ALLOWS CAREW AND OTHER CLAIMS, INCLUDING BELL, BUT
NOT HACKLEY Although the Carew entry was twice rejected in the past because of a lack of good faith, Secretary Smith found no evidence to support that charge and ordered that the entry be allowed. The earlier findings were based on the testimony of John Lesley at the 1889 officers' hearing. The Secretary felt that Lesley's statements were suspect because they were made in a revengeful spirit by a person interested in discrediting Carew's claim. Also ordered allowed were the claims of Frank Jones, Julius Caesar, Enoch B. Chamberlain, the heirs of Louis Bell, and Martha Lewis, the mulatto widow of Andrew Stillings, to one lot each. The preemption application of Daniel Mather was rejected on the grounds that he never intended to reside on any part of the land, but filed only for speculative purposes. The claim of the Hackley heirs was again denied because Robert Hackley himself had no legal right to initiate a claim. HACKLEY HEIRS GO AGAINST CAREW BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT This 1894 ruling was not the end of the title controversy. Unsuccessful within the Department of the Interior, the Hackley heirs brought their case before the Circuit Court for the Southern District of Florida. This case was dismissed and the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal. On November 7 and 8, 1904, the case known as Scott versus Carew was argued before the Supreme Court of the United States. Sally Field Scott and the other Hackley heirs were represented by an array of nationally prominent attorneys, including former Florida governor Francis P. Fleming. Lizzie Carew and the other defendants secured the services of William Wade Hampton, Edward R. Gunby, and Horatio Bisbee, Jr., the latter being for four years the area's Republican Congressman. A decision affirming the dismissal by the Court of Appeals was handed down on January 3, 1905. Justice David J. Brewer wrote for the Court that Hackley was a trespasser on the land and had had no legal right thereto. Carew and the other settlers of 1883 were the lawful owners.
|
|
Meanwhile, Ft. Brooke
continued to develop as its own separate municipality with
its own elections, mayor and other city officials such as
marshal and city council. Lesley also served as its
municipal judge.
|
The Fort Brooke Post Office didn't last long, as it was ordered shut down in Feb. of 1897.
|
John T. Lesley is elected mayor of Ft. Brooke again.
|
HENDRY & KNIGHT PLANS FOR THE GARRISON This 1895 plat shows two lots, 9 & 10, planned for the Fort Brooke garrison land by Hendry & Knight. The draftsman has rotated the view so that most of the streets are vertical and horizontal. (Garrison Ave. and Krause St. actually run due East/West and Nebraska Ave. actually runs North/South.) Notice at lower left, Hendry & Knight represented Lizzie W. Carew and the Carew Land Co. among others. The red outline marks the location of the Carew home, with Carew Ave. just south of it. Hendry & Knight also represented W.W. Hampton (for whom Hampton Ave. was named) and Edward Gunby, men whose services were procured by Lizzie Carew for her Supreme Court defense. Also see at lower right and upper right, underlined in green, the subdivisions of Lewis Bell and Enoch Chamberlain, whose claims were also allowed.
|
|
Mouse over the photo below to see how the town of Fort Brooke fits in this area today. Brorein St. replaced Hampton Ave., Platt St. follows Carew Avenue. Garrison Ave. became Cumberland. A portion of Eunice Ave. still exists. The Carew home was located at the north end of the present day convention center. Here, the Hendry & Knight survey has been rotated to fit the actual compass points.
The photo below shows the old Fort Brooke area in 1911 with ships at the Mallory Steamship Company docks at the Hendry & Knight Terminal. Looking north along Franklin Street, it is apparent that much of what was planned in the Hendry & Knight survey of 1895 did not come about.
|
|
|
This marker is placed at the northwest corner of the intersection of Franklin and Brorein Streets, in the island where Brorein splits between Franklin St. and Florida Ave. |
|
OFFICERS QUARTERS FORT BROOKE - Maj Gen ANDREW JACKSON (1st Provisional Governor of Florida) (7th President of the United States) First Recommended This Area As A Military Site In 1818 (established 1824) During the 1st Seminole Indian War Brig Gen ZACHARY TAYLOR (12th President of the United States) Commanded From Here, 1838-1840 the U.S. Army in 2nd Seminole Indian War. Photo by Roy Winkelman, Jan. 7, 2006
|
This marker is placed at 101 N. Franklin St. at the Fort Brooke parking garage.
|
|
SALUTING THE DEAD Photo from the Sunland Tribune, Volume VII Number 1 November, 1981 (Founded 1973 by Hampton Dunn) Journal of the Tampa Historical Society, HAMPTON DUNN Editor
|
Apparently, there was a 2nd cemetery
or the one found at the Fort Brooke garage construction site was
much larger than they expected. The graves found recently
at the "Water Street" development site in 2018 is considerably
due east of the Fort Brooke garage.
See "17-year-old graves found during construction of Water Street, Tampa"
Photo below from the above article. |
The cemetery excavation is in the central
portion of the photo surrounded by privacy fencing. See this article published Nov. 28, 2018 in the Tampa Bay Times newspaper: Water Street Tampa uncovers graves from 1800s and more of city’s past See this report of a 2008 archeological excavation of a barrel well at Ft. Brooke, located where the US AmeriBank is now located. The detailed report was published in the The Florida Anthropologist Volume 64 Numbers 3-4 September-December 2011. The report gives a well-documented history of Fort Brooke.
This photo and caption is from
that report: |
This marker is at the intersection of S. Franklin St. and East Brorein. The marker is located under an elevated section of the Leroy Selmon Crosstown Expressway, adjacent to a parking lot under the structure.
In the summer of 2010, this area
was undergoing road work for the TECO streetcar line.
|
|
Robertson & Fresh photo below courtesy of USF Digital photo collection
|
Above: The Old Fort Restaurant at the corner of Franklin St. and Platt St., Jan 1947. The cannon on the roof was designed with neon lights to simulate firing. Notice the historical monument placed by the D.A.R in 1928, at lower left of the above photo. Now this is the location of the Tampa Convention Center. Left: By the late 1950s, the Old Fort Restaurant had expanded its building almost to the curb, eliminating the patio area.
|
Tampapix pages
featuring former locations of Fort Brooke
The
Life and Times of James T. Magbee and Tampa during the Civil War
Tampa Convention Center
| Cotanchobee Fort
Brooke Park |
The Ice Palace (St. Pete Times
Forum)
Tampa City Government Cotanchobee Photo Gallery
The Riverwalk at Cotanchobee / Ft. Brooke at night
Photo Sources:
Tampa Town, 1824-1886 FamilySearch.org (for census images) Tampa Bay Magazine Tampa Public Library Burgert Bros. digital photo collection, HCPLC.org
University of South Florida Library Digital Photo Collection
|
History Sources: |
Brooke, Col. George Mercer, Jr. (1974) Professor of History Virginia Military Institute, Lexington, Va Early Days At Fort Brooke, Sunland Tribune, Vol. I No. 1, (Tampa, July 1974) at USF Library's Scholar Commons City of Tampa Past Mayors, John Thomas Lesley, 12th Mayor of Tampa Covington, James W. (1980) "The Hackley Grant, The Fort Brooke Military Reservation and Tampa," Sunland Tribune: Vol. 6 , Article 2 at USF Library's Scholar Commons . Covington, James W. (2018) "Some Observations Concerning the History of Fort Brooke and Tampa," Sunland Tribune: Vol. 22 , Article 6 at USF Library's Scholar Commons. Exploring Florida, Old Fort Brooke Parking Structure Memorial Florida Center for Instructional Technology, Exploring Florida: Social Studies Resources for Students and Teachers (Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, 2009) Ivey, Donald J. (2018) "John T. Lesley: Tampa's Pioneer Renaissance Man," Sunland Tribune: Vol. 21 , Article 3 at USF Library's Scholar Commons. LaGodna, Martin M. (1975) "Some Petitions Relating Tampa Families and the Disposal of Fort Brooke Lands, 1882-1883," Sunland Tribune: Vol. 2 , Article 5. at USF Library's Scholar Commons
Lewis, Jeffrey (1982) "How Tampa Lost the Fort Brooke Military Reservation"
Young, June Hurley (1982) "He
Built a Fort in the Wilderness," Sunland Tribune: Vol. 8 ,
Article 11 at
USF
Library's Scholar Commons. |
|