WHO WAS LOUISE FRANCES DODGE?
WHATEVER HAPPENED TO HER AFTER THE 1904 MAY FESTIVAL?

DID THE DODGES DODGE THE DISASTER?
Continued from previous page.

DISASTER STRIKES SAN FRANCISCO


 

Oil painting titled San Francisco Fire, 1906 by W.A. Coulter. The artist's vivid portrayal of the fire that burned for three days, destroying thousands of buildings, was first sketched during repeated trips on the Sausalito Ferry during the evacuation of the city. Coulter later completed the painting on a 5- by 10-foot window shade he salvaged during the fire. Image of painting courtesy of the W.A. Coulter Retrospective Exhibition Committee of the Paul and Linda Kahn Foundation. Courtesy of the California Department of Conservation.
 

   
1906, April 20 - TAMPANS DISTRESSED BY THOUGHTS OF THE DODGES IN SAN FRANCISCO

The Tribune reported that friends of Louise in Tampa were alarmed by the knowledge that she and her parents were living in San Francisco.  Nobody in Tampa knew if they escaped the disaster.  Other Tampans such as Judge Donovan, Rabbi Stollnitz had relatives there.

Crowds watching the fires set off by the earthquake in San Francisco in 1906, photo by Arnold Genthe. Library of Congress at Britannica.com.

The night before the 1906 earthquake, renowned Italian tenor Enrico Caruso performed in San Francisco. The world-famous opera singer escaped the city’s Palace Hotel where he was staying at the time of the quake, however, the hotel itself was destroyed by fire later that day.

   

The article at left says Caruso spent the night in Golden Gate Park.  This is where many refugees fled and tents were set up for them.  The article below claims Caruso was "one of the first" persons to get across the bay to Oakland and he gazed from the rear of the departing boat at the fires "which had broken forth a few minutes before."  Not possible. The fires started immediately at the time the earthquake struck.  He could not have boarded a ferry with seven trunks and baggage minutes after the fires began, especially since he spent the night in Golden Gate Park.  Fire and damage would have prevented anyone from going near the ferry docks the day of the earthquake.

THE EARTHQUAKE AND FIRE

Info below combined from Britannica.com, U.S. Geological Survey website and California Dept. of Conservation.
 

 
San Francisco had experienced earthquakes in 1864, 1898, and 1900 but nothing like the 1906 event.  At almost precisely 5:12 a.m. local time on April 18, a foreshock occurred with sufficient force to be felt widely throughout the San Francisco Bay area.  A noise "like the roar of 10,000 lions" rose as the entire city began to tremble and shake.  The great earthquake broke loose some 20 to 25 seconds later, with an epicenter in the Pacific Ocean just offshore from San Francisco.  Cable cars abruptly stopped, City Hall crumbled, and the Palace Hotel’s glass roof splintered and littered the courtyard below.  Violent shocks punctuated the strong shaking, which lasted some 45 to 60 seconds. The San Andreas Fault slipped along a segment about 290 miles long and the shaking was felt from Los Angeles in the south to Coos Bay, Oregon, in the north, and inland as far as central Nevada.  Damage was severe in San Francisco and in other towns situated near the fault, including San Jose, Salinas, Stanford and Santa Rosa.  

Edison movie footage at Britannica.com from Library of Congress.

Figure at right shows the extent of the 1906 rupture seen at the surface. The total length was 296 miles. For comparison, the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake had a rupture length of about 25 miles (blue).

Below is a seismogram recorded in Gottingen, Germany, 5,654 miles away. It shows how the ground moved in Germany as a result of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. Small wiggles, beginning 1/2 inch from left end, signal arrival of first compressional (P) waves. Large wiggles half way along represent arrival of slower-traveling shear (S) waves. The part of the record shown here spans about 1600 seconds or 26 minutes. The instrument subsequently went off-scale when surface waves arrived.


Bill Ellsworth, U.S. Geological Survey website. Images courtesy of same site.

The quake was followed by a massive fire that swept from the business section near Montgomery Street and the south of Market district toward Russian Hill, Chinatown, North Beach, and Telegraph Hill. The blaze continued for four days, until its smoldering ashes were ultimately extinguished by rain.  In the process, more than 500 blocks in the city center—covering some 4 square miles (10 square km)—were leveled. The inferno destroyed some 28,000 buildings, and the total property value loss was estimated at $350 million.  Some 700 people originally were thought to have died in the disaster, but the death toll is now believed to have exceeded 3,000. Moreover, about 250,000 were left homeless; survivors camped in Golden Gate Park and dunes west of the city or fled to outlying towns.

BELOW:  1906 American Company map with Burton & Rey map of burn district superimposed from Boston Rare Maps collection.  Red lines in the burned district indicate the fire paths. 

It is important to know about maps such as these and what is said about the maps at Boston Rare Maps.
 

Just as today, the American public was fascinated by mayhem, and publishers churned out a flood of imagery depicting the destruction of San Francisco. ...If anything, the map understates the extent of the destruction: the burnt district was among the city’s most densely populated, while much of the area shown had been laid out for development but was at most lightly inhabited.

This was a city PLAN map and not necessarily what existed.  Many of these outlying subdivisions were barely developed, sparsely inhabited,  without paved streets, or completely undeveloped sand dunes,  especially the hilly areas. Many of the streets did not yet exist nor were they developed for many years.   The numerous map makers who capitalized on the destruction used maps created from city planning maps as their basis.
 


Red lines indicate the progression of fires.

Earthquake and fire map animations showing progressions of shaking and fire.
USGS Map showing areas of highest ground acceleration 

LOCATION OF SAN ANDREAS FAULT & PERCEIVED SHAKING OF 1906

Wide range view of greatest ground acceleration and the San Andreas Fault 1906 quake epicenter.  The shaking was more pronounced on the west side of San Francisco. USGS Map.

The burned district map below is an altered version of one from the California Dept. of Conservation website.  It is a modern day base layer map as evidenced by the SF- Oakland Bay Bridge.  There were no bridges across the bay until the 1930s.  TampaPix has added overlays showing the location of the Union Ferry Depot and ferry routes from 1906 and other landmarks. The  towering depot is one of the iconic photos of devastated SF. The stars mark the start points of the major fires.  See below for the "W."

SEE THIS MAP FULL SIZE


HISTORICAL ACCOUNTS:  Mrs. Eleanor Watkins was the wife of a San Francisco surgeon.  Excerpts of her eyewitness account of the quake and the fire from her home (W) can be found on the California Dept. of Conservation website along with amazing photos which are displayed larger when you click on them.

Read Mrs. Watkins' description of the disaster.

Gallery of Photographs Related to the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake, Fire, and Refugee Camps shows most of the tall downtown area buildings did not suffer catastrophic damage from the earthquake itself.  Damage from shaking varied due to construction type and soil makeup.

Earthquake shaking intensity map from ResearchGate.net by S. Tobrinner.
Color has been added to original B&W image.

 

1906, April 25 - A letter was received by Mrs. Brash which Louise sent on April 16, two days before the quake.

1906, April 28 - The Dodges were safe at a nearby mountain resort. The article claims that Louise and her parents left SF two days before the disaster, but Louise's report to the Tribune written Apr. 29th (see below this article) says she was in SF the day of the earthquake.

    1906, MAY 8 - REPORT FROM MISS DODGE DESCRIBES THE DISASTER

A description of the disaster written on April 29th by Louise Dodge from Camp Meeker was received by the Tribune.  It was written "more than 10 days after the disaster" which took place on April 18.  It is important to note that the events she described were NOT in chronological order.  The blasting of the buildings she refers to was the fire department blowing up buildings to create a "fire break" hoping to prevent the fire from spreading.  There was no water to fight the fires, the water mains were shattered by the earthquake.


 

UNDERSTANDING THE ARTICLE

"Last Monday I passed through the city after the fire on the way to this point where my parents had been spending a few days." Louise refers to Monday, Apr. 23,  five days after the earthquake, one day after the fires were out, and five days before writing this letter from Camp Meeker.    So where was she before she passed through the city last Monday the 23rd?  Her passing "through the city" was not necessarily through the fire damaged area and was more likely a passing through the suburbs on the outskirts of the business district.

In the next sentence of the same paragraph she backtracks five days to the day of the earthquake..  "On the day of the earthquake friends took me out of the city on a wagon with them, and from a suburb we listened to the blasting...and watched..."  She was in San Francisco the day the quake hit. Her use of the phrase "out of the city" doesn't seem to mean out of San Francisco, but instead away from the central business district which was on fire.

Recall that in the April 25 Tribune article about the letter received by Mrs. Brash which Louise wrote two days before the quake (the 16th),  Louise stated she was "preparing to leave San Francisco.  Now in this article, she says she was taken out of the city the day of the earthquake.  It might be that she planned to leave with her parents on the 16th to go to Camp Meeker where they were to spend a few days, but either went there and returned, or remained in the city and only her parents left.

In the same paragraph, she immediately goes on to describe the beauty of the Santa Clara valley fauna along with great damage in San Jose and Stanford. "...but on every side were signs of shock.."  At this point she has traveled a good 15 miles or so southeast of the city of San Francisco and was on her way to Camp Meeker.

"We lost our trunks and articles of value..."  This would have been whatever was left behind in their apartments, indicating she could not or did not go back to retrieve anything.


"The shock did little damage here where my people were spending a few days..."  She refers to her parents at Camp Meeker.

...and though I was at our apartments in the city, I left it about noon the same day, spent several days with friends, and then after the fire made my way here in a roundabout way, driving a considerable distance."  She doesn't say what day she's referring to when she says "...the same day..."  She could mean the same day her parents left for Camp Meeker, but more likely she backtracks, referring again to the day of the earthquake, but in more detail, then she skips to Monday, the 23rd, after the fires when she left the suburbs and made her way to Camp Meeker.  This would be when she witnessed the damage in Stanford, Santa Clara and San Jose.

This trip would have started on Monday, Apr. 23 from the suburbs, "driving a considerable distance, as the trains were not running." through the Santa Clara valley, and on up to Camp Meeker.  She doesn't say SHE drove, nor does she say that the trip was driven the entire way.

"My father went down to the city to look for me...visited the refugee camps near the city, but we finally got word to him and he returned yesterday."  There were no bridges across the bay, the Oakland Bay bridge opened in 1936, the Golden Gate didn't open until 1937. Below is evidence he was in Oakland.


This was among hundreds of personal ads in this newspaper by persons looking for friends and relatives or persons announcing they survived and were trying to get word to others of their location.

 See The History of Transportation in San Francisco.

Louise doesn't say when she got to Camp Meeker, but it seems that at some time after her return they were able to get "word to" her father who had gone looking for her.  He returned on the 28th.

"One of the few things that I saved was the watch given me by the Women's Clubs of Tampa." You will hear of this watch again fifty years later.


People watching from suburb hillsides as downtown San Francisco burned.
Gallery of Photographs related to the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake, Fire, and Refugee Camps shows many of the downtown area buildings did not suffer catastrophic damage from the earthquake itself.

PROBABLE SCENARIO

The most probable chronological scenario is that Louise was planning to leave SF with her parents on the 16th as evidenced by her letter she sent to Tampa two days before the disaster.  She could have escorted them there, then come back into SF, but more likely she changed her plans and only her parents left.  On the morning of the earthquake, the 18th, she was somewhere in San Francisco's Western Addition or near the business district in her apartment.  (The earthquake started at 5:12 a.m. so she was probably in her apartment, sleeping.  ) By noon she was taken by friends on a wagon to an area in the suburbs where they watched the business district burning. This was probably somewhere in the Western Addition in the direction of Golden Gate Park and the Presidio.  She didn't mention where she stayed for those five days except that she was with friends.

On the 22nd, rain put out what was left of the smoldering ashes.  On Monday, April 23 when the fires were out she drove or was driven from the suburb in sight of the earthquake ruins along the west side of the burnt district and southeastward parallel to lower San Francisco Bay through Stanford, Santa Clara and San Jose.  Louise said the trains were not running.

Then she went from Santa Clara around the south end of SF bay, northwestward, probably in the vicinities of  Oakland, Berkeley, San Pablo, Napa, Santa Rosa and finally Camp Meeker.  If she was driving, it probably would have been her own car, if she had one.  This would have been unlikely because she had to be taken out of the city on a wagon, thus leaving any car she owned. However, if she lived outside of the burn district west of Van Ness Ave., she could have retrieved it, though she makes no mention of going back to her apartment. Having lost their trunks and valuables, it is doubtful she was able to gain access to the inside of her apartment.  It probably did not burn but may have sustained structural damage.

Some time around the 22nd to 25th, her father came down from Camp Meeker to look for her.  Somewhere in the surrounding area of SF,  he put an ad in the newspaper and waited at the Oakland Post Office.  Probably not seeing it, Louise arrived in Camp Meeker somewhere around the 25th or 26th.  Mr. Dodge had probably made plans with his wife of where he could be contacted if Louise arrived before he did.  Having received word she was at Camp Meeker, Mr. Dodge returned on the 28th.

Louise mentions having lost all their trunks and valuables and she probably didn't mean empty suitcases.  Valuables probably meant more than just jewelry.  Their apartment could have been a boarding house or apartment building as they had not been in SF for more than five months when the earthquake hit.  Later, you will see the importance of the fact they lived in an apartment and did not own their own home.

See interactive map of damaged areas of San Francisco.  Click on an orange area to see photos of damage in that area.

Very large panorama of burnt district at Wiki  Movie footage at Vimeo

Evacuation of San Francisco by Southern Pacific Railroad
 

 

THE DODGE FAMILY AFTER THE EARTHQUAKE

The Dodges were listed on the 1909 San Francisco city directory living at 1457 Franklin. The "r" denotes this is a residence.  This directory did not list spouse's names.  At this time Mr. Dodge was  73 and Louise was 34.

This location is a business and condos/apartments area today and located just one  street west of Van Ness Avenue, an area which was not damaged by the fire in 1906.  It is possible this was where the Dodges lived before the earthquake.  Compare 1905 and 1913 Sanborn maps to follow below.
 

        

The close-up below shows the area today is overrun by condos and apartment buildings. 

The David Rumsey Map Collection contains extremely rare map images of pre-earthquake San Francisco from 1905.  The pages are brown and heat damaged.

Below is enhanced and rotated (it was upside down with north at the bottom) from the David Rumsey Map Collection 1905 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map San Francisco - pages 257 & 258  The blocks have been moved closer together to conserve space and present them as large as possible.  The red rectangle marks the address where the Dodges lived on the 1909 San Francisco City directory.

 

 

 

 

The numbers in red inside each dwelling appear to be property numbers.  The Dodge's dwelling was about 80 ft x 20 ft and was 2-story with a basement.  The units were separated by brick-filled partitions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This 1913 Sanborn Map from Library of Congress shows the building where the Dodges lived wasn't destroyed in the earthquake and appears to have remained unchanged.  They may have lived there when they first arrived in San Francisco in late 1905, and could have moved right back soon after the April 1906 earthquake.  This area west of Van Ness wasn't damaged by fire.  However, the mirror image building across Franklin St. was gone (X).

TampaPix has altered this map by moving the blocks much closer together.  The streets were actually about as wide as the blocks, except for Fern St. which was about half the width of the other streets.

 

 

 

 

 

The Dodge's apartment building has the footprint of the commonly used row house style for many  San Francisco dwellings of the period.     A terrain-view map shows this area with sloping streets downward from west to east.


 


Below: San Francisco earthquake of 1906 - Row houses in San Francisco, tilted by soil liquefaction after the San Francisco earthquake of 1906. From Encyclopedia Britannica.

 

 

 

THE DODGES ON THE 1910 CENSUS

In April of 1910 David & Helen Dodge were still living at 1457 Franklin St., but Louise was no longer living there.  Mr. Dodge was a retired clergyman and Mrs. Dodge worked as a housekeeper in a lodging house.  They were in their early 70s and had been married 44 years.

 


1910 CENSUS - LOUISE IN ST. LOUIS

By 1910 Louise had moved to St. Louis, MO and is found on the 1910 Census there as a lodger in the home of Michael Cultner and his family.  

There are four errors on her entry here:  She was listed as "Louis," male, and age 39.  Louise would have been 35 in 1910.  The columns for nativity of her parents have been edited out to conserve horizontal space.  It showed her father born in New York, which is correct, but her mother born in Iowa--incorrect.  Helen Dodge was born in Michigan.  All these problems can be a result of enumerator error and the info not being taken from Louise herself.  With so many errors, how can we know this was actually Louise? She had been there in 1904 to attend a woman's club convention and the St. Louis World's fair, as well as the Olympics.  But the best evidence is "Louis's" occupation:  NEWSPAPER REPORTER.  Was she a reporter because that used to be her career, or was she currently working as a reporter?  The last two columns answer this:  #21-Whether out of work on Apr. 15, 1910:  "No."  #22 - Number of weeks out of work during year 1909:  "0.

1913 - DODGES OWE $2.50 IN TAXES FOR PALMER UNION OIL STOCK

This article of Aug. 29, 1913 listed thousands of stockholders who owed a tax on their shares.  The fact they owned stock shows that David & Helen Dodge were at least depending on investment earnings for income.  Recall also that David also was receiving a pension for being disabled in the Civil War.   Each owned 125 shares of Palmer Union Oil Company common stock and owed $1.25 each, indicating a penny per share tax.  The Fed began taxing income in 1913 so this may have been a federal income tax assessed on the company which was being passed to the stockholders. 

Palmer Oil Company - Oilfield discovery in 1908 at Cat Canyon, CA, began company's lengthy corporate convolution.
The search for oil and natural gas began in 1904 at Cat Canyon in the Solomon Hills of central Santa Barbara County, California.  Exploration companies unsuccessfully drilled there for four years before Palmer Oil Company discovered an oilfield about 10 miles southeast of Santa Maria. "Oil Age Weekly” on September 9, 1910 declared, “The Palmer Oil Company is generally concluded to have opened one of the biggest and richest oil fields in California by the bringing in of its two gushers in the Cat Canyon District, now doing 10,000 barrels per day between them. The success of Palmer Oil brought new investors, and the company was capitalized at $10 million by the beginning of 1911.

1913: WORST YEAR EVER 

Perhaps the most forgotten period in American economic history is the eight years that followed the creation of the Fed and the income tax in 1913. From 1913 to 1921 the growth rate came in at just 1.4 percent per year. The period included two long recessions: one beginning in 1913, in which that year’s level of production was equaled only two years later (and with the assistance of military production that did nothing for living standards), and another from 1919 to 1921 that was simply the worst depression the nation would ever suffer outside of the 1930s. The new income tax system hit persons making as little as $1,000 a year ($11,000 in today’s terms).
 

1914 Sep. 8 - LOUISE DODGE BACK IN CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY BY SEP. 1913.

Louise was on the decoration committee for the University of California's sophomore hop (dance.) Being that Louise was a sophomore in the fall of 1914, she could have been a freshman starting in the fall of 1913.

SENIOR WOMEN REMOVE THE BAN ON PROGRESSIVE DANCING ON CAMPUS

 

 

1915 Apr. 9 - LOUISE DODGE PARTICIPATES IN UCAL'S FOURTH ANNUAL SPRING FESTIVAL

Louise participated in the spring festival celebration dressed as a "Blackamoor," a style of decor and character portrayal considered to be a racist stereotype today. Blackamoors are usually presented as ornately dressed servant figures bearing light by holding a candle, candelabra or torch, or the figure may be holding up a tabletop or carrying a basket of fruit.Blackamoor.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary

 

The article below has been shortened by showing only the first three or four lines of names for each character portrayal.

 

1917, APRIL 1
Louise entertained guests at her home at 2204 Dwight Way in Berkeley with a dinner party for her birthday.  Three male students from the university attended, along with her mother and Mrs. Ruf.  Louise was 42.

 

 

 

Louise served as a Precinct 28 polling place judge at the southwest corner of Dwight Way and Ellsworth for Berkeley city elections in Aug. 1918, June 1919, Apr. 1920, Aug. 1920, Oct. 1920, and Jan. 1921. This was a tent just down the street at the next corner.

 

 

 

2204 Dwight Way today, on the right.
Today this property is assessed at nearly a million dollars
.

The 1911 Sanborn Fire Insurance map below has been rotated to match the view of the house photo above.  South is at the top of the map.  The house today appears to have the same footprint as it did in 1911 and could be the same house.


Map courtesy of Library of Congress

1919, July 31

MR. & MRS. DODGE CELEBRATE THEIR 54 YEAR WEDDING ANNIVERSARY

This article gives an accurate biography of David A. Dodge, but not of Mrs. (Helen Mills) Dodge.

  • Married in Adrian, Michigan in July 1865, at the close of the Civil War.

  • Mr. Dodge served as a captain in the 18th Michigan Infantry.

  • For some years he was an attorney in Waterloo, Iowa.

  • Later he entered the Presbyterian church ministry in Michigan and Florida.

  • One daughter, Miss Louise Dodge, is a well-known newspaper woman, having been with the Tampa Tribune.

  • INCORRECT: Mrs. Dodge is a descendant of an old New England military family...etc.  It is Mr. Dodge who is a descendant of the old New England military family through his mother, Ruth Freeman Dodge.  She was a descendant of Ebenezer Learned, an American Revolutionary War veteran.

  • The Dodges came to California in 1905.

       1920 CENSUS OF BERKELEY, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
2204 Dwight Way - David A. Dodge (83), Helen M. (82), Louise (44) single.
None had an occupation; they were renting their home ("R" in column 7)
This is a large dwelling and they were probably only one family of multiple apartments.


The census date was Jan. 1, so Louise would turn 45 later in April.

 

LOUISE ASSISTS IN PROMOTING AN EVENT FOR A NEW MEN'S SOCIAL CLUB, THE AGNETIAN CLUB

In 1920 Louise was a member of the Young Ladies' Auxiliary and helped to promote the new Agnetian Club's first social event.  The club was named for its location in St. Agnes Parish, a Catholic church district.
 

 

 

 

Typical of newspapers of the era, nothing was published about the event after it was held.

What was a "card party?"

History and photos St. Agnes Catholic church, San Francisco.

 

 


Site of the May 8, 1920 Agnetian Club card party & dance.
The Fairmont Hotel, a luxury hotel building in the Beaux-Arts style, on Nob Hill, built in 1907, as seen in this 1920 San Francisco postcard. Courtesy of SFGate.com, "1920: What San Francisco looked like 100 years ago"


 

1923, July 12 - This Tribune article claims Louise had become interested in politics and held several offices in Berkeley and had become well-known in musical circles as an assistant pipe organist at Trinity Methodist church in Berkeley.  The complete name of this church was "Trinity Methodist Episcopal church of Berkeley." No article of their organists or musical programs was found.
No article could be found that mention Louise in any civic or political office, or a church's music program.

1923, July 27 - Louise reported about the fires and wind storms that swept up and down the coast of California in 1923.  She was remembered in Tampa as "the originator of the annual carnival" which referred to Gasparilla.

 

The wildfires caused $10M damage in Berkeley.

 

1924, Jan. 11
THE OAKLAND TRIBUNE REPORTS OF THE DEATH OF HELEN DODGE

Louise's mother died on Jan. 10, 1924 in Berkeley.  She was 84.  She was described as the wife of Rev. David A. Dodge and mother of Louise Frances Dodge.  Her funeral was held at the First Presbyterian church in Berkeley and she was buried in Adrian, Michigan. 

Her entry at Find a Grave.

 

 

 

 1925, May 1- THE DEATH OF DAVID A. DODGE

Louise's father died on Apr. 29, 1925 according to the California State death index; he was 89.  After the death of his wife, he entered the Old Soldier's Home in Yountville.  He was described as "Dr. David A. Dodge, retired Presbyterian minister and Civil War veteran and not regularly attached to any Berkeley church, he many times preached from local pulpits.  He was a captain of Co. I, 18th Michigan Infantry and member of Lookout Mountain Post 88, G.A.R. of Berkeley.  G.A.R stands for  Grand Army of the Republic.
 
Excerpt from The Berkeley Daily Planet - Feb. 12, 2008: Historical Society Opens GAR Vet Group Records
Post 88 was established in Berkeley on Nov. 14, 1885. After the war between the states ended, the veterans returned to their homes or established new homes throughout the U.S.  Civil War veterans groups were established all over the country, including 102 of them in California alone. The chapters or “posts” held regular meetings, collected dues, and went to “encampments,” a sort of campout-convention-get-together, where they exchanged stories and ideas. Quite a few were held in the Bay Area. Each post selected a name for their group in addition to the number and region in which it was located. Many of them chose the name of a famous battlefield or important location in the war. Berkeley chose Lookout Mountain in honor of the battle that took place there in Tennessee. The Lookout Mountain Post first met in the Odd Fellows Hall in Berkeley and later in the Veterans Memorial Building when it was completed in 1928. Post 88 had 221 members, who served in many Northern troop branches, including the U.S. Navy, Calvary, Infantry, Sharpshooters and Artillery. The post existed for 54 years. Many of the veterans were buried in Sunset Cemetery in El Cerrito or Mountain View Cemetery in Oakland.

1923 photo of eight remaining members of Post 88. The four standing members are, left to right: M. R. Mead, Nathaniel Michael Miller, C. C. Reed, and Joseph Honer. The four seated members left to right are: W. H. Wharff, Erie Alanson May, George Ober, and Waterman Van Ess.

 

SEE Newsletter of the Berkeley Historical Society "EXACTLY OPPOSITE" Vol. 39, #2 "Berkeley's Civil War Legacy: GAR Lookout Mountain Post 88 and Woman's Relief Corpts No. 35" by Fred Etzel, the source of the info below and photo at right.

On November 14, 1885, Berkeley’s Civil War veterans established Lookout Mountain Post 88. (The Battle of Lookout Mountain was fought on November 24, 1863 as part of the General Grant’s successful Chattanooga Campaign. An unknown member of Post 88 may have fought in that battle.) At the same time, the wives of the members of Post 88 formed Woman’s Relief Corps No. 35. Both Lookout Mountain Post 88 and W.R.C. No. 35 met in the Veterans Memorial Building located at 1931 Center Street.

info@berkhistory.org

 

Yountville is in the heart of Napa Valley, nestled in Napa Valleiy's wine country.
See a history of the Soldiers Home from its beginning in the 1880s.  
See history at Wiki, now called the "Veterans Home of California."
See photos at CALVET.
125 Year Anniversary of the Veterans Home, 2009.

Photos below from California Historical Landmarks in Napa County at NoeHill Travels in California


California historic landmark 828 at SW corner of California Drive and Hwy 29, Yountville.

  Old postcard photos below courtesy of Card Cow


1886



The Hospital



 

   

LOUISE ON THE 1930 CENSUS, IMOLA, NAPA COUNTY

In 1930 Louise was listed as a patient in the Napa State Hospital.  Before 1922 this was called the "Napa State Insane Asylum." She is listed by her middle name, Frances, instead of Louise, female, age 55, single, born Iowa, father born New York, mother born Michigan.  Except for her first name swapped with middle name, all is correct. How long had she been there?  Answer is to come later below.

Imola was originally an unincorporated area in Napa County in the 1870s, located on the Southern Pacific Railroad, 1.25 miles south of Napa.   The area was named for a town of the same name dating back to 1304 A.D. in the province of Bologna, Italy, which maintained a large insane asylum.  The Imola post office opened in 1920, and closed in 1953.

 

         

NAPA STATE HOSPITAL, IMOLA
Photos and  info from Napa Valley Marketplace, Kirkbride Buildings.com, Napa Valley-from golden fields to purple harvest, California Dept. of State Hospitals, The Historical Marker Database, and Wikipedia

KIRKBRIDE BUILDINGS - Formerly state-of-the-art mental healthcare facilities, Kirkbride buildings have long been relics of an obsolete therapeutic method known as Moral Treatment. In the latter half of the 19th century, these massive structures were conceived as ideal sanctuaries for the mentally ill and as an active participant in their recovery. Careful attention was given to every detail of their design to promote a healthy environment and convey a sense of respectable decorum. Placed in secluded areas within expansive grounds, many of these asylums seemed almost palace-like from the outside. But growing populations and insufficient funding led to unfortunate conditions, spoiling their idealistic promise (to put it mildly.)

Kirkbride buildings are named after Dr. Thomas Story Kirkbride, a nineteenth-century physician and asylum superintendent who authored a treatise on hospital design. This treatise and Dr. Kirkbride's other work had a far-reaching influence on the construction of American insane asylums through much of the latter half of the nineteenth century. Kirkbride buildings are most recognizably characterized by their somewhat unique "bat wing" floor plan and their often lavish Victorian-era architecture. Their design was an attempt at creating a space to facilitate the return to sanity. The buildings were conceived by Dr. Kirkbride and his contemporaries as active participants in treating the mentally ill.

Dr. Edmund T. Wilkins
Superintendent from Mar. 1876 to Feb. 1891.

The first hospital for the mentally ill in California was the Stockton Asylum for the Insane which opened its doors in 1851. It was built to accommodate 80 patients but within 20 years the institution became desperately overcrowded. During the 1869-70 term, the California State Legislature passed an act enabling Governor Henry Huntley Haight to appoint Dr. E.T. Wilkins as a commissioner to research existing asylums in the United States and Europe to gather ideas and plans to build the second state asylum. Dr. Wilkins made an exhaustive report favoring the "moral treatment" of the mentally ill and presented it the governor on Dec. 2, 1871.  After reviewing it, the state legislature approved an act to build a second state hospital. In 1871, Dr. E.T. Wilkins, Dr. Benjamin Shurtleff of Stockton, and Judge C.H. Swift of Sacramento were appointed to select a site for the proposed asylum.

The trio issued a report that recommended a site at Rancho Tulocay, owned by Don Cayetano Juarez, due to its arable land and healthy water supply, as well as its proximity to the railway and Napa Embarcadero (wharf).

 

Image courtesy of Wikipedia


Rancho Tulucay was a 8,866-acre Mexican land grant in present day Napa County, California given in 1841 by Governor pro tem Manuel Jimeno to ranchero Cayetano Juarez.  The Tulucay name originates with the names Tulkays and Ulucas that were applied to the inhabitants of Tuluka, a Patwin village in the area. The grant was on the east side of the Napa River, between Soscol Creek on the south, and Sarco Creek on the north.   See source Wikipedia for more.

In 1872, approximately 192 acres of land were purchased from Juarez for $11,506. In 1872, Wright & Sanders of San Francisco were awarded the contract for the asylum, a building which was to be “constructed of either brick or stone that would accommodate at least 500 patients—cost not to exceed $600,000.”   Work began for the erection of the 500-bed, four-story, Gothic Hospital building.  Ground was broken in Oct. 1872 and construction began on Feb. 11, 1873, the cornerstone laid and the building was dedicated on Dec. 24, 1874. 

 


Front view of the main building which was known as "The Castle."
Postcard photo courtesy of Napa Valley Register.com.

Building materials included Vermont slate, Colfax marble, and millions of bricks manufactured on-site. The three to five story building was composed of one main “castle” and two identical wings. There were a total of seven towers, four of which were used to store water for the facility’s gravity-flow elevator system, as well as fire protection. The building was allegedly a mile in circumference. There was much political controversy surrounding the cost of the building. Democrats argued that the building was needlessly extravagant and expensive, and Republicans defended the cost as necessary to create a healthy environment for the mentally ill. The final cost of the building has been variously recorded as anywhere between 1.25 and 1.75 million dollars.

Originally named the Napa State Insane Asylum, the facility opened and admitted its first patients on Monday November 15, 1875. The seven-towered domestic Gothic structure was elaborate and ornate, and its uniqueness made it one of Napa's early tourist attractions.  The hospital faced west with wings extending on each side, allowing for plenty of fresh air to flow throughout the facility.   During the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, statues atop the roof and towers toppled to pieces to the ground but the buildings remained largely intact.  There was even an underground cog railroad that was used to carry meals and laundry to the hospital's wings.

The Hospital was once self-sufficient, with its own dairy and poultry ranches, vegetable gardens, fruit orchards and other farming operations that provided a large part of the food supply consumed by the residents.  Later, more land was purchased bringing the total to 2,062 acres.  This included a wharf on the Napa River, a siding at the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks, vegetable fields, a duck ranch, and the Skyline Park ranch.  Streams to the east were dammed at an outlying ranch bounded by Coombsville and Green Valley roads to provide the hospital's main source of water.  Cattle was raised on the Napa State Hospital Farm just northeast of Yountville which also provided beef for the Veterans Home of California, and San Quentin.

The average stay for patients was about three months to a year. A standard of moral treatment was established from the earliest days of the hospital, with occupational therapy programs and exercise classes as part of the treatment.   The Napa Asylum treated patients for a variety of ailments. Many of the early residents were admitted due to alcoholism or homelessness. Women admitted at the end of the 19th century were often diagnosed with acute mania, melancholia, or paranoia. By the early 1890s, the facility had over 1,300 patients which was more than double the original capacity it was designed to house. In 1893, the Mendocino State Hospital was opened and relieved some of the overcrowding at the Napa hospital. 

In 1922 the Department of Institutions was established and viewpoints changed.  The name of the facility was changed to "Napa State Hospital" and the term "insanity" became recognized as "mental illness."  The castle's main buildings became outdated and were demolished in 1949.

This rear view of the hospital shows laundry drying in the sun  propped on racks in the yard.  An orchard can be seen in the foreground.
Photo from Napa Valley Marketplace
 

BURIALS:

A two-acre piece of land on the eastern portion of the campus behind the administration building was designated as a cemetery for indigent patients from about 1875 through 1923 and became the final resting place for 4,368 patients' remains. These were patients for which nobody claimed their remains, hence the responsibility of burial fell on the State of California. For research purposes, the original name Napa State Asylum can be found on old death certificates issued prior to 1924 which is when the name was changed to Napa State Hospital.  At one time, the cemetery did have wooden crosses marking each grave, but in the 1920s after the burials stopped, the land became a pasture; by the 1940s a dairy farm was on it; and today, the site has an unused barn and an outbuilding on it.   Since land for burial on the campus was limited, an on-site crematorium was built at Napa State Hospital in the mid-1920s and was in use until sometime in the 1960s. In the 21st century, two old grave markers from this era were found. In 1983 a single marker was placed in remembrance of those buried on the hospital's grounds.  No bodies were ever exhumed from Napa State Hospital grounds, but the unclaimed cremated ashes of patients have been transferred elsewhere: The ashes of 440 patients were buried with numbered markers in the pauper's section at St. Helena Cemetery; and at least 5,100 patients' ashes were buried in a mass grave on October 28, 1968 at Napa Valley Memorial Park on Napa-Vallejo Highway. Napa Valley Memorial Park has in the past used the names of Inspiration Chapel and Chapel of the Chimes. Twenty-eight patients were buried in unmarked graves in the pauper's section at Tulocay Cemetery. Today, the few patients who do die at the Napa State Hospital are transferred to their county of residence for funeral arrangements to be made by the family or an appointed representative. The hospital has an annual memorial service in remembrance of the patients who died that year as well as the others of earlier years.

 

Today, the location of the original hospital is home to administrative offices and doctors' offices.
The patients' units are south of S. Oak Drive in buildings designed and laid out like prisons.  None of the patients are there voluntarily, they are all sent there by the State court system.

 

WHY WAS LOUISE HERE IN 1930?

We may never know the answer to this and can only make some general conclusions based on circumstances.   Her mother died in 1924 in Berkeley where they were renting their home on Dwight Way. Her father entered the veterans' care facility soon afterward and died in there May 1925. 

Except for the five years she spent in colleges at Ann Arbor, MI and Nashville, TN from 1895 to 1900, and the one to four years at most that she spent in St. Louis in 1910, she lived with her parents all her life, including at Winter Haven while she worked for the Tampa Tribune.  Her parents' deaths may have had a huge impact on her psychological well-being.  (But wait, there's more later.)  There is no evidence that she ever had a job after leaving Tampa except for her 1910 census in St. Louis. 

 

1932, April 5 - This article says Louise was visiting in Napa Valley and spoke "enthusiastically of the beauty and prosperous appearance of the valley."

Was she really just visiting?

 

How did the Oakland Tribune know this?

1932, July 31 - Louise received a card from Pierre de Coubertin in response to her message of well-wishes she sent him. Charles Pierre de Frédy, Baron de Coubertin, was a French educator and historian, co-founder of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), and its second president. He is known as the father of the modern Olympic Games and was particularly active in promoting the introduction of sport in French schools.
Info and photo from Wikipedia.

 

The 10th Olympic games were held in Los Angeles.


Photo courtesy of Olympics.com


DEATH OF LOUISE FRANCES DODGE

Louise died at the Napa State Hospital in Imola, Napa County, California on June 19, 1933 at 11:30 a.m.  Her cause of death was listed as "Carcinoma of Breast," the date of onset was "5 yrs."  This would date back to around June 1928. 

The record also shows that her birth date (Mar. 22, 1875), birth place (Waterloo, Iowa), and names of her parents (David A. Dodge and Helen Mills) were obtained from her "commitment papers, Napa State Hospital."  Although no commitment date is provided, it can be calculated because the exact "Length of residence" in this city or town, down to the number of days, was provided. In this case, the place was the hospital.   Subtracting 9 yrs., 5 mos., and 3 days from her date of death results in Jan. 16, 1924 as her commitment date.  This was six days after the death of her mother in Berkeley at age 86 and would explain the location of her father's death at the "Old Soldiers' Home" in Yountville the following year.  His obituary stated he entered the facility "with the death of his wife about a year ago."  Louise was unable to take care of her father. 

Her commitment date also indicates that the two newspaper articles about her in 1932 were written while she was confined.

Her doctor, Bert. M. Johnson, stated that he attended Louise from Aug. 21, 1931 to Jun 19, 1933, so he was a doctor at the state hospital.  Louise was cremated three days later on June 22, 1933 at the hospital crematorium.  It was built in the 1920s due to lack of space in the existing hospital cemetery and was in use until the 1960s.  As the history of this hospital states earlier on this page, with nobody to claim her ashes, they were probably buried at the cemetery and then transferred with those of 440 patients' ashes to a mass grave at Napa Valley Memorial Park in 1968.

See her death certificate.



THE FRIDAY MORNING MUSICALE CELEBRATES ITS FIFTY YEAR ANNIVERSARY - 1952
 

FALSE CLAIMS ABOUT THE DODGES
At the last of five events of the FMM anniversary celebrations, which spanned from Oct. 5, 1952 to May 10, 1953, a report about Louise Dodge was read to those in attendance.   This "mini-bio" about Louise was written by one of the club's charter members, Mrs. Mary Spencer Caldwell, but read by someone else due to her "impaired eyesight." Mrs. Caldwell was 80 at this time, so she would have been around 30 when the club was founded and 32 or 33 when the Dodges left Tampa. 

On May 17, 1953, the Tampa Tribune published a brief one-paragraph article about the last anniversary event, making no mention of the report. 

In the May 31, 1953 Tribune, D. B. McKay covered the event in more detail in his weekly column, "Pioneer Florida." It is here where he revealed what he claims to be the content of the report.  In bold all-caps, it begins, "IT WAS RECITED..." 

It praised Louise for her accomplishments in Tampa. There are a some false statements made regarding Louise's parents. 

The second paragraph, bolded and in all-caps, makes the claim that Louise had a cousin who was a "fabulously wealthy New York philanthropist" who bought Mr. & Mrs. Dodge a home in San Francisco in "early 1906" and so Louise decided to move there with them. 

It goes on to describe the events of the earthquake; that it destroyed their home and caused Louise to be separated from her parents, and the tremendous psychological impact it had on Louise.  Basically saying that the disaster erased her mind, and only her name on her watch led rescuers to her parents, and she never recovered, spending the rest of her life in a nursing home.  It ends stating that her parents died "shortly after the disaster."

If you've read these two pages on the life of Louise Dodge, you already know that much of what McKay reports is wrong.  McKay was 85 at the time.  It remains to be seen if all of his story was completely from Mrs. Caldwell's report.

At the end of this feature, TampaPix addresses all the false claims made in McKay's article, and questions the very idea that such a depressing, tragic (and mostly false) story as reported by McKay would have been read at the celebration.

 

1952, Sep. 14

At right:  In 1952 the Friday Morning Musical planned five meetings to celebrate its fifty year anniversary.  The first event one was to be held on Oct. 3, 1952, at the American Hellenic Center.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1952, Oct. 5
THE FIRST FIFTY YEAR ANNIVERSARY LUNCHEON

On Oct. 5, 1952, the Tribune published a full page article about what transpired at this first event.  Officers of the club "dressed in appropriate costumes" and presented skits highlighting the club's past fifty years.

They credited Mrs. Douglas Conoley and Mrs. R.J. Weller for referring Louise Dodge to Mrs. Ferris, "a leading piano teacher in Tampa."

Charter members present (members of the club when it was first organized) included Mrs. Annie Macfarlane McPherson, who was a daughter of Hugh Macfarlane, now remembered as "the father of West Tampa," responsible for the initial founding and growth of West Tampa as a city. 

 

Read the full article only, without photos, from which the two excerpts at above were taken, here at TampaPix.  As well as the above sections, it covers the club's operatic work, orchestras, school music work, and past presidents.


Annie Macfarlane was an very talented vocalist and musician in her youth, giving many local performances.

Mrs. Frank H. Caldwell was Mary E. Spencer Caldwell, also a charter member.  More about her below.

Later revealed in an article by D.B. McKay, Mrs. Caldwell  composed a short biography of Louise Frances Dodge which was read at this meeting.  TampaPix has found quite a few errors in this bio, the sources of which have already been presented here which disprove some of the statements made in Mrs. Caldwell's report.  She was probably relying on false memories and assumptions to fill in gaps.  D.B. McKay would write an article about this presentation in his May 31, 1953 page "Pioneer Florida."  He may have even added his own thoughts.  Both would have been trying to recall what happened almost fifty years earlier.

This article by D.B. McKay is presented further below.


You can read more about the anniversary celebrations and see photos from this Oct. 5, 1952 full page Tribune article, including a portrait of Mrs. Ferris, HERE at TampaPix's feature about Mrs. Ferris.  Don't miss it, there's lots of history on the pioneer Ferris family of Tampa!

1953, May 10
FINAL ANNIVERSARY EVENT ANNOUNCED

The final FMM anniversary event was to be held at the Crystal Ball restaurant on May 15, 1953.

Miss Katherine Ferris, one of the charter members mentioned here, was the daughter and only child of the club's first president, Mrs. W. H. Ferris.

Mrs. Mary Spencer Caldwell was born in Fla. in 1873, she was the widow of Dr. Frank H. Caldwell who died on Jan. 20, 1906 in Tampa.  They married on July 12, 1904 in Tampa, he was 47, she was 31. After his death she lived in Tampa with her brother, Laurence Spencer and his family.  Mary died in Tampa at age 83 on Apr. 20, 1956. 

"Appropriate program numbers, combined with surprise features" had been arranged for the event.

Mrs. Don McKay was D.B. McKay's wife.

 

 

 

 

 

1953, May 17
THE TRIBUNE REPORTS ON THE FINAL ANNIVERSARY EVENT

The Tribune's coverage of this final event was very brief. One of the features of this event was Mrs. J. R. Casey who wore a turn of the century costume in a skit portraying the Tribune reporter Miss Elizabeth [sic] Dodge covering the first meeting of the club.

 

 

1953, May 31 - PIONEER FLORIDA BY D.B. MCKAY REPORTS ON THE FINAL EVENT

After his time as mayor of Tampa and owner/editor of the Tampa Times, D.B. McKay wrote a history column titled "Pioneer Florida" for the Tribune, which was later compiled into a 3-volume book series.  McKay was also editor of Karl Grismer's history of Tampa in 1950, so Grismer's book contains much of McKay's input.  McKay's feature usually filled a whole page and covered three to five topics or so.  Readers would write the Tribune in response to McKay's feature and offer more related stories and sometimes disagreement, which would often be presented in the next feature.

In the May 31, 1953 Pioneer Florida article below, McKay discusses the Friday Morning Musicale's final luncheon which celebrated its fifty year anniversary.    He says the club recognized that chief recognition for its creation was due to Louise Dodge and Mrs.  Ferris, and goes on to mention other early members.  He describes events at the most recent anniversary meeting which was held at the Crystal Ball on May 15, 1953. 

He says a paper was read at the luncheon that was prepared by Mrs. Mary Spencer Caldwell, an original member of the FMM, but was read by another member due to her impaired vision.  (Mrs. Caldwell was 80 at the time.)

McKay begins Mrs. Caldwell's report with "IT WAS RECITED" but it's not known if McKay's story was copied from Mrs. Caldwell's report or if it could be from his notes, or if any of it was his own input.  The first section seen below is quite accurate according to what has been presented in this TampaPix feature, with evidence to support it.

EXCEPT FOR: 

  • Louise was hired by the Tribune in July 1901, not 1902.

  • Her father was NOT "of Boston" or anywhere near it.  This is a false memory or an assumption.  Mr. Dodge was born in Rochester, NY, in 1837.  His life has already been presented in detail in this feature about Louise Dodge.  He wasn't born in Boston, nor did he ever live there.
     

PART 1 OF 3 BELOW.

Mr. Dodge is not mentioned by name; it was probably due to having been forgotten.  Mr. Dodge is never mentioned as having ill health in the news.  He did lots of traveling between Winter Haven and Tampa, and attended several Presbyterian conferences in the state.  When the Dodges left Florida, they toured the country for about four months on their way to California.  He did file for a Civil War pension in 1893 when the Dodges lived in Michigan.


The next paragraph was published in bolded text. 
Whether this was in Mrs. Caldwell's report or it was added by McKay it is not known.   You can see the article and photos at the feature about Mrs. Ferris here at Tampapix.  McKay was born in 1868, and would then have been 85 when he wrote this article.

The founding club president, Mrs. W. H.  Ferris, remained president until just before her death in 1924--twenty-two years.. 

PART 2 OF 3 BELOW  
ABOUT THAT FABULOUSLY WEALTHY COUSIN - COMPARING LOUISE DODGE'S ANCESTRY TO GRACE DODGE'S ANCESTRY

McKay claims, or is reporting on what Mrs. Caldwell's report stated, that Grace Dodge, "fabulously wealthy New York philanthropist," was a cousin of Louise, and that she gave Louise's parents a beautiful home" in San Francisco early in 1906."  and "Miss Dodge felt it her duty to go with her parents to the new home." 

So a necessary inference is that the San Francisco home was first bought for Louise's parents, and so Louise decided to move there with them because it was her duty. 

Contrary evidence:  The news of the Dodges' decision to move to California was made known in the Tribune on Mar. 5, 1905, so the decision to move there would have been made even sooner.  This was at around a full year before Grace Dodge is said to have bought them a home in SF.  Was Mrs. Caldwell or McKay only incorrect about the year?  Or are these false memories?

Louise left Tampa by train in April 1905 for Jacksonville, then planned stops in Atlanta, S. and N. Carolina, Washington DC, NYC, where her parents would join her, and then they were to go on to New England states.
 

But instead, M&M Dodge left Tampa on May 25 to meet Louise in WASHINGTON D.C.  It isn't known if they visited NYC or  New England states.  They made their way west, sightseeing the country on the way.  Louise wrote the Tribune from Portland, Oregon on Aug. 1, 1905 and they were in San Francisco in EARLY AUGUST 1905 as stated in her Nov. 12, 1905 letter from San Francisco published in the Tampa Tribune.  So they were in SF at least five months before Grace Dodge reportedly bought them a home there.

Were Grace and Louise Dodge really cousins or was this just rumor or gossip, or a legend that started and evolved over the past 50 years?  Was it based on an assumption that they must be related due to the well-known David Low Dodge in the wealthy NY family?  Could it have been an idea that sprouted and grew in Mrs. Caldwell's or McKay's as false memories over the years, becoming convincingly real at this point?  (False memories discussed at the end of this page.)

Below is a comparison of Grace Dodge's ancestry to Louise's ancestry.  If they were 1st cousins, they would share the same grandparents.  If they were 2nd cousins, they would share the same great-grandparents.  If they were 3rd cousins, they would share the same great-great-grandparents.  As you can see, they don't share any ancestors at all.  They don't even share the same gr-gr-gr-grandparents, though not shown here.

A quick search finds a Britannica dot com entry: Grace Hoadley Dodge (born May 21, 1856, New York, N.Y., U.S.—died Dec. 27, 1914, New York City) was an American philanthropist who helped form organizations for the welfare of working women in the United States. Dodge was of a wealthy family long active in philanthropic work.  She was a great-granddaughter of David Law Dodge, New York merchant and peace activist, and granddaughter of William Earl Dodge, metals business executive and philanthropist."

By 1906, Grace Dodge was involved with the YWCA and was appointed as chairman of the new joint committee to unite the American YWCA and the International Board of the YWCA, which were separate entities at the time. The article concerning this says she was not a member of either organization.

The obituary of Louise's paternal grandfather, David Dodge II (DDII), doesn't mention any ties to this well-known, influential and wealthy Dodge family. DDII was born in Herkimer Co., NY in 1797 where his father, David Dodge I had just moved.  Within a year after DDII was born they moved back to Mass. and to Oxford, Mass., in 1819.  DDII married in Oxford, MA in 1826 to Ruth Freeman, a descendant of Br. Gen. Ebenezer Learned of the Revolutionary War.

DDII and Ruth soon moved to Rochester, NY (1826) where Louise's father, David Archiblad Dodge (1837), and at least 6 other children were born.   DDII's obit said he was a stone mason and master builder, constructing 3 churches in Rochester and excavating below the falls of the Genesee River.  That endeavor was a failure as the investors who were funding the project went bankrupt.  The Dodges moved to Ionia Co. MI in 1843 where David II became a farmer and died in 1886. 

It is a certain fact that Grace & Louise were NOT first or second cousins.  It is HIGHLY DOUBTFUL that Grace was aware of anyone who would have been her 3rd cousin, which by definition meant they had the same great-great grandparents.  To think that a 4th generation descendant would have kept in touch with, or even been aware of Louise's father, who had left the state of Michigan after marrying in 1865 and moved to Iowa where Louise was born, moved back to Michigan, then Florida in 1900, then California in 1905, is an unlikely scenario.  Especially for Grace Dodge, a very busy woman.  Her charities were organizations, and though she theoretically have privately helped Louise's family, it's virtually impossible that she knew of them.  In four generations there could be hundreds of living descendants.  These were times of letter-writing.

Grace having a birth year of 1856 would put her at about 20 years older than Louise, who was born 1875 in Waterloo, Iowa where her father was a lawyer at the time.   TampaPix has found good evidence that Louise may have been related to Clara Barton, going way back to Ebenezer Learned in Oxford, Mass. in colonial times.

Known Dodge first cousins of Louise who whose death year is unknown or after 1875--children of brothers and sisters of her father, being grandchildren of David Dodge I and Ruth Freeman.
Children of Nancie F. Wantie Dodge & William Jennings
Charles W. Jennings, b. 1847
Frank C. Jennings, b. 1849
David W. Jennings, b. 1850 d. 1910 m. Fidelia Lousa Rice 1877, Ionia MI.
Mary Frances Jennings, b. 1852 d.1892 m. Judson C. Bentleyi 1871 Ionia, MI
Minessa Arabella Jennings, b. 1855 d. 1925 m Walter Harshorn Merriiam 1877 Ionia, MI
Nancy E. Jennings, b. 1861 d.1948 m. Fred T. Mason 1888 Ionia, MI
Children of Elvander W. Dodge & Clarissa S. Walker
Harriet Dodge b. 1856
Cordette Dodge b. 1858
David Freeman Dodge b. 1860 m. Margaret Burke 1900 NY
Children of Alexander DeWitt Dodge & Louise Clark Lovell
William Dodge b. 1858 m. Julia E. Harriet Trumbull
Helen Lowell Dodge b. 1862 d.1943 m. Frank G. Kneeland 1882 Ionia, MI
Edward Larned Dodge b. 1864 d. 1923 m.Nellie Sheppard 1890 Ionia, MI
Cyrus L Dodge b. 1865 d. 1877
Children of Martha Dodge & Orson S. Kendrick
Frances Kendrick b. 1853 d. 1942 m. George Bannerman
Children of Mary F. Dodge & Walter J. Tabor
Jennie A. Tabor b. 1859 d. 1923 m Silas M. Gleason 1881 in Ionia, MI
Children of Ruth E. Dodge & Ira Winegar
Jane Augusta Dodge b. 1865 d. 1880
Ira Weston Winegar b. 1868
Children of Sarah Jennie Dodge & Dr. Freeborn F. Hoyt
Benjamin Floyd Hoyt b. 1871 d 1944 m. Eva May Eggleston 1900 Los Angeles, CA
 
 
CONCLUSION OF D. B. McKAY'S ARTICLE

Of primary concern here is why would Mrs. Caldwell write such a tragic, depressing story to be read at such a joyous celebration as the 50th anniversary of the FMM?  And especially at the last event of the celebration so that it would be the last thing weighing on everyone's minds.  Or was this something McKay added to the story for his column?

Was Mrs. Caldwell writing from memories? Was McKay writing from memories? Forty year old memories for 80 year olds can be vastly evolved from the actual events, especially if one doesn't think of them very often.  Time has a way of completely changing one's perception of past events.  We are all too proud if we think that our memories are rock-solid and unchanged by time.

"Their home was destroyed..." Louise's letter to the Tribune from Camp Meeker ten days after the earthquake specifically mentions what they lost--their trunks and valuables. They lived in an apartment; she mentioned this more than once, Louise never mentions living in their own home.  She never mentioned any residence except for their apartment.   Would Louise have been too shy or humble to mention a rich philanthropist cousin?  Would she have been embarrassed to admit it or considered it boasting?  Was it humiliating to her that their parents didn't buy their own home?  TampaPix doesn't think so.  Not even in her letter of November 1905 did she say anything about a beautiful new home.  

Had they owned a home, it's highly doubtful that Louise would not have even briefly mentioned losing it or it suffering some damage.  Could she have wanted to keep her letter positive and not bring up personal thoughts, to not worry readers or cause them to pity her?  Possibly, but she probably would have found a way to mention it and keep it positive.  After all, writing was her expertise.
 

"Miss Dodge and her parents were separated in the horror and confusion..." Not so. McKay's article implies that they were together when the earthquake started and it caused them to be separated.  We already know that Louise's parents had left SF for Camp Meeker before the earthquake.  The earthquake did not cause them to be separated. 

"She wandered in the ruins several days, and when found by a rescue party her mind was a complete blank..."  We already know that she was taken out of the city by friends the morning of the earthquake, and watched from nearby suburbs for four days until the fires were out.  This was written in her lengthy letter to the Tribune from Camp Meeker just 10 days after the disaster.

"...she could not tell her name nor give any information about herself..."  In her letter sent to the Tribune ten days after the earthquake she described vivid details about the event, and where her parents were when the earthquake hit.

"The watch given by Tampa friends with her named engraved on it..."  In 1904 when this watch was presented to her at  the farewell reception, the Tribune wrote "the watch bears in engraved letters the names of the clubs..."  McKay now mentions that her name and "appropriate sentiments of appreciation..." were on it.  This sounds like a generic statement that someone would make because it's what one typically expects to be engraved on the back of a watch.   How big was this watch to have the lengthy names of at least three clubs, sentiments (even if just "Good Luck!"), and Louise's name on it (which surely would have included her middle name?  He makes no mention of the names of the clubs which was the only inscription described in 1904.

We can't rule out that Louise was keeping the truth secret and didn't reveal what really happened to her.  But the fact that she wrote an incredible description of the disaster just ten days after it is evidence that she was quite stable and not psychologically devastated by the earthquake.  In fact, her comments about survivors going about their ways in a positive state of mind is corroborated by many newspaper articles describing the disaster.

As for the rest of McKay's article, we can definitely discredit what he wrote, or what Mrs. Caldwell reported, or both, and when part of a statement can be discredited, it all becomes suspect.

"She never recovered her mentality and spent the remainder of her life in a nursing home."  This feature has already shown irrefutable evidence that after the earthquake, the Dodges lived in San Francisco until just before 1910, when they  moved to Berkeley.  There was evidence that Louise wasn't living in Berkeley on the 1910 Census and instead lived in St. Louis for a time, working as a reporter.   There is proof that Louise attended the University of California at Berkeley starting in Sept. 1913 and participated in school activities in 1914 and 1915.  She entertained Berkeley students among her guests at her birthday dinner party in 1917, which was published in the Berkeley Daily Gazette and repeated in the Tampa Tribune. These weren't stories originating in letters to friends in Tampa.  These were news articles that neither Mrs. Caldwell or McKay were aware of or didn't remember.

She served as a precinct polling place judge at the Alameda County polls in 1918, 1919, three times in 1920, and in 1921,  located down the street from where she lived in Berkeley.  These were articles published in the Oakland newspapers under legal notices which named elections officers appointed to serve in Alameda County.

"She did have brief, lucid periods, during which she wrote to friends in Tampa."  How would anyone know that these letters were written during the "brief, lucid periods?"  Not receiving letters during her mentally unstable periods?  It's not possible to conclude what's going on during periods of lack of communication.  It was an assumption that she lived the rest of her life after the earthquake in a nursing home that led to assuming that she never regained her mental stability after the "amnesia" caused by the earthquake.  So therefore lucid letters received had to be, in their minds,  from brief lucid periods when she would write. 

"Her parents died soon after the great calamity."  This is the ultimate proof that the report is based on assumptions with no knowledge or accurate memory of what really happened--memories that have been completely changed over time, forgotten facts, exaggerated and dramatized over the years, or just plain fabricated by Mrs. Caldwell or McKay.  The statement that "she spent the remainder of her life in a nursing home" is probably a confused memory of where her father died.  Louise's parents died 18 and 19 years after the earthquake, in 1924 and 1925.  This isn't "soon after the great calamity."
 

TampaPix believes that Mrs. Caldwell may have been in touch with Louise or have known someone who had been in touch many years earlier when the Dodges first moved to SF.  They remembered that the Dodges were in SF for the earthquake. Years later, they may have heard about the deaths of Mrs. and Mr. Dodge,   They may have heard that Louise had been committed to a state mental hospital.  Over the span of 25 to 45 years, all these thoughts evolved, blended together, and were influenced by other events, changed and continued to evolve as false memories.  The death of Mr. Dodge in a nursing home combined with Louise's confinement at the Napa State Hospital produced a combined memory, one that included the brief mention of her watch in the 1906 article.

As evidenced by other false statements about Louise's family, it all fits in with how false memories are created.  Different events over long periods of time, undocumented by the storyteller, with nothing unchanging to refer back to, blended together over time with the subconscious altering of the facts as one's brain tries to make the puzzle pieces fit together.  Along the way, other events, other memories, things other people say, influence the memory.  All this taking place without Mrs. Caldwell knowing, she writes these false memories down on paper as if it happened yesterday.  Events are out of order from reality, such has Louise's parents died shortly after the earthquake.  Louise had a rich cousin who bought her parents a house, but turns out they had actually moved there several months before.   Whether or not Louise's name was on the back of the watch cannot be proven, but the brief mention by Louise as being one valuable she saved from the disaster could be enough for any club member to form into a false memory over the years.

Mrs. Caldwell's story could have been a combination of memories, true or false, gathered from various other members of the club or friends.  Any one of the contributors may have wondered once or twice over the years if this Grace Dodge  philanthropist they had heard of was related to Louise.  Seeds that could have sprouted and became one big tree. 

From Can You Trust Your Memories? and False Memories

Although memories seem to be a solid, straightforward sum of who people are, an avalanche of research reveals that our memories aren’t static imprints of past events but rather reconstructions of our experiences that are much more complex, highly subject to change, and often simply unreliable. What we remember is continually reshaped by new information and a variety of factors that influence what we recall and how we recall it  Memories of past events can be reconstructed as people age or as their worldview changes.

Media and external events can seep into and reconstruct our memories. News reports, social media, and even casual conversations influence our recollections and blur the line between our experience and secondhand information. For example, after 911, the constant exposure to footage of the second plane hitting the World Trade Center led many to form detailed memories of having seen it live, even if they didn’t. This phenomenon, known as flashbulb memories, shows how repetitive media can distort our memories.

If you see a photo of a person you have never met, for example, and mutual friends have shared descriptive details on time they've spent with the person, you may later start to believe that you have in fact met the individual.

People regularly recall childhood events falsely, and through effective suggestions and other methods, it's been proven that they can even create new false memories. A person’s malleable memories often involve the mundane, but they can often be far more consequential, such as unreliable eyewitness recollections of a crime. Human memory is pliable and easy to manipulate. A distorted memory or the introduction of later, false information can affect how we recall events we experienced firsthand.

A person's existing knowledge can impede and obstruct their own memory, leading to a newly formed, cobbled-together recollection that does not accurately reflect reality. Also, under certain circumstances, a person can be given false information and be convinced to believe that an event that never occurred actually did. When this happens with lots of people, it's called the "Mandela Effect."

Imagination can be a culprit that distorts our memories. Presented with incomplete information, the brain seeks to fill in the gaps with assumed or imagined details, blending into past events what we wish or imagine could have happened.

Emotions profoundly impact how we remember the past. Emotionally charged events are more vividly recalled because stress hormones enhance memory formation, and negative emotions tend to overpower and supplant positive ones. This distorts our memories, making deeply emotional aspects of an event stand out while more positive aspects fade away. For instance, a family vacation may be remembered mostly for a meltdown with teenagers rather than for the relaxing moments at the beach.

Social influences also transform our memories. When engaging with friends and colleagues, we often craft shared narratives to bond or fit in. This can result in the memories of others overriding our own. For example, if a friend mistakenly recalls that you both attended a book fair together years ago, you might start to believe you were there and adopt their memories as your own, even if you actually weren't there.

This shape-shifting nature of memories is like the classic game: A whispered story morphs and mutates with each retelling, as players add their own selective hearing, interpretations, and biases. Ultimately, the final story little resembles the original. Imagine the drastic effects this game would have if it was drawn out over a period of forty years instead of four minutes.  Similarly, when you repeatedly mull over an old memory, it can become difficult to distinguish the original details from newly introduced ones created to fill in the gaps without your conscious thought.  Over a lifetime of brief flashes of the event, with subtle changes, the resulting recollection can be very different from the original one.

A psychologist of the University of California at Irvine, an influential researcher on memory who has consulted on many high-profile legal cases involving disputed memories...notes that everyone embellishes or adds to their memories during recall or recounting. Over time those changes, accurate or not, become part of the memory in the mind. She warns that human memory is not a recording device, but more like a Wikipedia page: You can change it, but others can, too.

MRS. CALDWELL, D. B. MCKAY & JAMES T. MAGBEE

D. B. McKay on Judge James T. Magbee's origin:  (The Tampa Tribune, Sunday, Feb. 23, 1947) Mrs. Caldwell asked me, "Why didn't you talk to me before you wrote that incomplete story about old Judge Magbee? (Referring to a previous Pioneer Florida article McKay had written. I could have told you where he came from, and why he left home. I had an uncle living in Georgia who was a brilliant lawyer and the state historian. When I was a little girl, my uncle told me that J. T. Magbee left his birthplace in a south Georgia county at the invitation of his neighbors, that the action was taken because of Magbee's bad conduct, and that he was accompanied to Florida by two sisters and a brother.It was Mary Spencer Caldwell who made that statement to D. B. McKay.

McKay follows this in his article with "The census for 1850 is in agreement with this statement.

The claim of Magbee being born in a South Georgia county is shown to be incorrect at the TampaPix feature "The Life and Times of James T. Magbee. And McKay's claim of "agreement" with the 1850 census is just plain FAKE history--a lie and he knew it. 

Because Magbee's brother (Samuel), sisters (Penelope Adeline, and Rachel Elizabeth) AND mother (Susan) are NOT on Tampa's 1850 Census, they are on the 1850 of Heard County, Georgia.  And they were NOT in Tampa on the 1860 Census, his mother and sisters were on the 1860 Census in Heard Co., Ga.  They don't appear in Tampa until the 1870 Census--in James' home.  And his brother Samuel was still in Georgia in 1860 and 1870, and 1880.  It's not until 1900 that Samuel appears in Hillsborough County--in Riverview (then named "Peru.")

INSTEAD, all these members of James' family were STILL IN HEARD COUNTY, GA. in 1850, proving they did NOT COME TO TAMPA with James T. Magbee.  In Heard Co, GA in 1850 are James Magbee's parents, Hiram and Susan, and their  children Adaline (Penelope), Samuel,  Elizabeth (Rachel), and William.  In 1860, only Elizabeth and Adaline are found in Hiram's and Susan's household. 

1850 Census, Heard Co., Georgia


James T. Magbee's parents, Hiram and Susan Magbee, with James's siblings Adaline (20), Samuel (19), Elizabeth (14)  & William (12).  James was enumerated in Tampa with his wife in 1850.

1860 Census, Heard Co, Georgia
Below, James' parents Hiram and Susan Magbee, with only their daughters Elizabeth and Adeline in their home. 

In 1870, the widowed Susan Magbee, mother of James T., and her daughters Elizabeth and Adeline (Penelope) were in Tampa living in the home of James T. Magbee and his 2nd wife, Julia A. (Henderson).

James' brother, Samuel B. Magbee, was living in Lee Co, Ga. on the 1870 Census, and in 1880 he was living in Terrell Co, Ga.  Samuel does not appear on the Hillsborough Co. Census until 1900 when he was lving in Peru (the original name of Riverview.)

Proof you can't trust D.B. McKay either.  His intent appears to be to elevate Mrs. Caldwell to the level of brilliant historian instead of contradicting her.  Or maybe he just couldn't find them anywhere or even didn't bother to look, and decided to publish fake news.

You can learn more about Tampa's most hated man after the Civil War here at TampaPix.  Before the Civil War, Magbee was a popular, leading citizen in Tampa, holding county and state government positions.

 

 
 

So what happened to cause Louise's commitment?  We may never know.  Probably the death of her mother on Jan. 10, 1924, since she was committed six days later   It could have been tragic, unexpected, an accident, she may have been away at the time.  Or this event could have just been the tipping point. They may have had an argument, she may even have felt she was partly or entirely to blame, whether true or not.  Louise may have been acting irrational.  Something may have happened with her father.  All speculation, of course.

Who was Louise Frances Dodge? Part 1

Back to the 1904 May Festival, the First Appearance of Ye Mystic Krewe of Gasparilla.